Summary of Universal History from the Beginning of the Earth to the Last of the Patriarchs.

III

THE LIDEARSHIP OF MOSES

 

Prologue to Moses

The discovery of human habitations in ruins under Istanbul waters brings me back to the creation of the Sea of Marmara during the days of the Deluge.

 

Historians have as 'divine' mission to recreate the Past. That what the personal memory means to an individual that History means to Mankind. The same process of privation of full mental power detected in a individual affected by loss of his memory we detect in a Nation affected of loss of its History. But when instead of recreating the Past do invent the "history" they become doctors of circumstances integrating in his patient a virtual memory made to soften the impact of the loss of his memory. And in doing so Historians recognize their impossibility to enter in the hall of History, and, accordingly, they create a Virtual Memory in the deep of which pages to hide their Ignorance.

However, an individual behaving with a memory nor of his own he falls in a schizoid process, and so do nations and Mankind.

We observe Mankind living under suicidal, schizoid circumstances, and we observe the loss of Memory for Mankind as a whole... To relate two as conclusion of one plus one it is a child play, and in consequence am not goin to draw further this statement. The matter of fact principle is by the Deluge the Loss of Memory for Mankind as an individual was signed and sealed.

The effect of a History without a Memory could not be but the bloody civil world war we have been through during these five millennia gone. There is a plus of around eight centuries and a half to add, according to Israel Era, space of time necessary to blow off a Universal Memory created during the Millions of Years took to God the Making of Man.

Anyway, between the ignorants the most, the Turks, in imitating the most civilizated, the Western Europeans, the Turks have discovered these days human habitations where once upon a time there were humans habitating the fallen bridge of land dividing the Yesterday's Lake of Marmara and the Today's Black Sea. This discovery comes as a matter of fact once put on the table, as a consequence of the Biblical Deluge: the Fall of the African-European Bridge, giving way to the Gibraltar Strait, and the Euro-Asiatic Bridge, becoming the Dardanelles Strait on the european side and the Bosphorus on the asiatic corner, which is where the modern city of Istambul displays its Horns.

With the Deluge the erasing of the Memory of Mankind as an individual, the Man, was finished. The result of this loss of Memory was soon to obey the schizoid law above given, and the new nations didn't wait much to devour one to another.

While tracing the individual History of the House of Abraham we have followed the growth of this mental distortion along the millennia between Noah and Abraham. Now I take the line from Abraham to Moses.

The Exiled Tribe of the son of Noah.

The vision of Abraham as a citizen of the New Kingdom of Ur, founded by Chief Nammu (2112-2095 BC) upon the ruins of the Fall of the Guti Invaders, it comes all by itself once put face to face the Divine Version of his life with the social and political situation of the Middle East during the days of Nammu. Historians deal with individuals, but History deals with People and Nations. Following this rule the Historians centered the action of the Fall of the Gutis in the Leadership of Utu-Khegal, and left in the dark the Coalition of Tribes who elected him to lead the War for Freedom. It was among this Coalition of Tribes and Clans that we found the grandfather of Abraham, Master of the Tribe of Noah, a Clan of Warriors of much wealth without which Power the Coalition could not have won victory. The inmense Power of the Tribe of Noah under the grandfather of Abraham we see it again in full display during the War of Abraham against the Kings. To accept the vision of Abraham as a nomad-gypsy hanging around the Mesopotamia of the last days of the Third Millennium before Christ it is to surrender freedom AND INDEPENDENCE OF INTELLIGENCE IN THE HANDS OF A SCHOOL FOR THE LOBOTOMIZATION OF THE COMMON MAN.

Any individual looking those days with his own eyes can see that a wandering tribe, moving from town to town in the midts of a world where the sword wrote the law and to kill was the main sport, without being backed by a powerfull army, as suggested by the Historians of the XXth Century, it could survive, it is a vision for fools. In days when only a powerful army could wander from town to town without being exterminated by the kings around, to accept the theory of the Historians it is to beg for a lobotomy.

Not accepting such an act of destruction of free thought, I said in the before section that the Abraham of the Bible was a Prince, tempted to be a king by the self-divinization of Shulgi, the son of Nammu, a crown that Abraham was in the edge to accept when the God of his father ask from him to give up, to go on exile and wander from town to town. If Abraham was stained with the fame of the cowards by the citizens of Ur, the valor and courage that a prince had to show to wander in the wilds of the nowhere lands between the cities of the kings it come in our help to show us that cowardice was not the reason of his exile.

The Historians of the end of the XIXth Century and beginning of the XXth Century while defending Christianity did much wrong to the glory of the Bible. The crossroad in which they found themselves excuse them for it, but we can't keep on going on a road leading to nowhere. To compare Abraham with a wandering bedouin was a mistake, and in the comparison their defense of their faith fell very low. The fact that they were brithish give us understanding of the why they did not resolve the problem with the accuracy and independence of mind that the problem was in need. Brithish were very fond of Christianity but very much against the God of Christ, and, to them AND BECAUSE the Bible was right but God was wrong. This schizoid faith, that British inheritated from their particular Reformation, led the Great Historians of the Museum and Cambridge to state that it is God who imitates Man. According to them, Moses' Law was an imitation of the Hammurabi's Law, and the God of Moses was an imitation, adapted to the Hebrews, of the God of the Pharaon Amenophis the Fourth. And so on.

The days of hunger in the Reign of Mentuhotep III.

But the milestone leading to the exact time of the final entering of the Hebrews, under Jacob and his sons, in Egypt can be found revisiting the news of Hungers striking the land of the Nile during the days of the reign of Mentuhotep III (2010–1998 BC). But Keep in mind that with the exact years of the reigns of the different kings and Pharaohs of the beginning of the Second Millennium BC it happens exactly the same that does with the distance from Earth to the star clusters around us, varying from astronomer to astronomer.

We can assume with all certainty that the Coalition against the Guti led by Utu-khegal had in his files the Tribe of Nahor, the grandfather of Abraham. Nahor conceived Terah, who lived the foundation of the New Kingdom of Ur by Nammu, and Abraham, his son, lived under the reign of Shulgi, which he left because the self-divinization of the son of Nammu. Hunger became a regional fever during Abraham days, which we can relate to the war of the kings, in love with fire, burning harvests and forests for the sake of victory over their opponents. A process which kept going on from Abraham to the days of Isaac, ans as it did not find a stop it became harder and harder until we find the sons of Israel emigrating from the Middle East.

The space of time who received Jacob and his sons, according to the Hungers suffered by the region, goes from Mentuhotep III (2010–1998 BC) to Senusret I (1971-1926 BC), and it is from this days that, intervening the Hyksos in between the XXth Century BC and the XVIth, the Hebrews lived under the rule of the Pharaohs. Taking this space of time fas the real ground where History took place, we can affirm that was not an Egyptian Pharaoh who ordered the destruction of the Hebrew male children, but one of the last of the Hyksos kings. It was not a Egyptian Pharaoh who was drawn under the waters of the Red Sea, but the last of the Hyksos King. This way we find that Israel saved the life of Egypt by the hand of Joseph, and again saved Egypt by the hand of Moses.

The Fall of the Hyksos and the Resurrection of Egypt Freedom having had place in the middle of the Sixteenth Century BC, the absolute lack of wirting evidence its is due to the old egyptian mania of erasing the memory of their no-good kings. So much for the memory of the Hyksos. This lack of evidence the Great Historians of the Ancient Middle East used as excuse to not give Divine Credit to the Bible. They had given the Bible very much Credit by admitting the existence of kingdoms and legends during the XVIIth Century and beginnings of the XIXth Century AD by the entire scientist community already denied. They could not go further. And what is more complex, they could not dive. Well, they could swimm. But to dive deep in the waters of the Red Sea searching for the Army of the Last of the Hyksos King ... And yet there is Pharaoh and his army waiting for another Schliemann.

Let's turn now against the Life of Moses .

 

CR.