| |
THE
CAMBRIDGE MEDIEVAL HISTORY
XXI
EARLY CHRISTIAN ART
NOT many years ago Greek
art seemed to be marked off from Roman, and Roman from Early Christian by wide
intervals. The art of Greece was typified by the buildings of the Athenian
Acropolis, Roman art by those of the imperial Forum and the Palatine, and
Christian art by the catacombs. Unceasing exploration and fruitful discoveries
have since brought to light so many works of the transitional periods that art
history has become rather the account of a continuous process than of clearly
defined epochs and schools.
The art of Rome itself
under the new light appears rather as one of the many later Hellenistic
schools, than as purely indigenous. Part of the transition from Classical Greek
may be traced in the art centres of Asia Minor, and part, again, in the
non-Roman city of Pompeii. As to the latter, it is held that the sequences of
style which have been distinguished in its wall-paintings were probably fashions
imported from Alexandria. The covering of internal walls with thin slabs of
rare coloured-marbles and porphyries, and the incrustation of vaults with
mosaics of gilt and coloured glass, had the same origin.
This process of change
in classical art carries us to some point in the early centuries of
Christianity, and many groups of facts show that it was long continued. Not
only did Egypt and the East export their porphyry, ivory, glass, bronze, and
textiles, but craftsmen were drawn to the Roman capital from every Hellenistic
city.
The works used or made
by the Early Christians could at first have been differentiated in no obvious
way from the current classical works of the time. When anything emerges which
we can entitle Christian Art, the change is, for the most part, manifest in a
new spirit dealing with old forms. The art was necessarily shaped externally by
the modes and codes of expression of the time. In many cases new ideas were
expressed under old forms; thus the winged angel derives from the antique
Victory; the nimbus is classical as well as Christian; the story of Orpheus is
interpreted as a type of Christ ; and Amor and Psyche are adopted as symbols of
the Divine Love and the soul.
In so far as there was
novelty it is clear that, as Christianity itself was from the East, so the
changed forms must themselves have held in them much that was oriental. Early
Christian art is Roman art in the widest sense, purified, orientalised, and
informed with a new and epical content which held as seed the possibilities of
the mighty cycle of Byzantine and Medieval art.
It is still in Rome and
in the catacombs that the best connected series of works of the first three or
four centuries of this early art is found. The great roads of approach to Rome
were lined by countless tombs of every degree of magnificence: rotundas,
pyramids, cellae, and sarcophagi. Amongst them stood vestibules to underground
tomb-chambers where large numbers were buried in common. Along their walls,
tier upon tier, urns of ashes were packed like vases in a museum. The Jews and
other oriental peoples followed the custom of burying the unburnt body in
subterranean galleries, and appropriate sites for these also were obtained
round about Rome. The Christians, following the same usage, at first shared
such catacombs, and in other cases formed groups of their own. The catacombs
were primarily not places of hiding, however much they may have been so used.
Frequently there was a space above ground planted as a garden, and made use of
as a cemetery. In some were small burial chapels from which access was obtained
to the catacombs beneath. The ruins of two or three such chapels have been
discovered and described. They agree in having had a central apse and two
lateral apses grouped together at one end.
There were also
subterranean chapels, the most famous of which is the Capella Graeca of the
Catacomb of Priscilla. It has, roughly, the form of a small nave or body, 8 by
25 ft., ended by an apse with lateral apses on each side of it. It opens from a
long vaulted apartment or atrium. The walls are decorated with paintings of the
usual subjects — Daniel, and Lazarus, Moses, Susannah, and the Adoration of the
Magi. On the vault over the nave are four heads representing the seasons. Above
the central apse is represented the Eucharistic repast. This
recently-discovered Fractio Panis is not only one of the most interesting, it
is also one of the most beautiful of the catacomb paintings, as may be seen in
the large photogravure published by Wilpert. The forms and features of the
seven participants are classic and gracious. It is painted in a masterly way in
a few simple colours on a vermilion ground. The inscriptions on the walls are
in Greek, hence the name of the chapel. In the apse was an altar-tomb. It
belongs to the second century.
Another catacomb church
is probably of the third century, and a third, the largest, in the catacomb of
St Hermes is probably of the fourth. The catacombs themselves are complexes of
subterranean passages and galleries excavated for the disposal of the dead, who
rested one above another along the sides. The chambers, more or less square,
were roughly vaulted above, and the vaults and walls were for the most part
decorated with painting, and occasionally with stucco reliefs. This
ornamentation was a branch of the ordinary house and tomb decorator's work of
the time, and the painted subjects were clearly executed with the swift mastery
which came of long practice in repeating a limited stock of ideas. The vaulted
ceilings were usually decorated by some geometrical arrangement of panels,
radiating from the centre and bounded by a large circle. In these panels were
little figures, groups, birds, and foliage. The colours were reds, greens, and
ochres, and a little blue, the whole mellow yet bright.
The subjects of these
paintings have been most thoroughly illustrated, and their chronology analyzed,
in Wilpert's large work. Under the first century he groups several schemes of
vault decoration in which the motives consist of the geometrical division of
the field, and of little putti and
foliage. One vault is entirely covered with a branching vine. On others of the
same century are landscapes and burial feasts, while the cycle of Biblical
subjects begins with Daniel standing between two lions, and the Good Shepherd.
To the second century he assigns vaults on which appear the Three Children in
the furnace, Moses striking the rock, the Eucharist, Noah and the Ark, scenes
from the story of Jonah, and subjects from the life and miracles of Christ; the
raising of Lazarus, the cure of the paralytic, the cure of the woman, and the
meeting with the Samaritan. The most noticeable and beautiful is in the
cemetery of Priscilla, and represents the seated Virgin and Child, with a
prophet standing by, and a star or the sun above. This is a small group at the
side of a central composition of the Good Shepherd, from which it is divided by
a flowering tree. This central subject and the trees on either hand of it were
roughly modelled in the plaster before colouring. The modelling of the tree is
but a few swift marks of the tool defining the trunk, and the leaves and
flowers are painted. The Virgin and Child are beautifully drawn with some
remaining tradition of classical feeling. The figures are only about a foot
high, and unhappily the lower part is much injured. The whole is very like a
sketch by Watts. Belonging to this century are two or three versions of the
Baptism. Another subject is the mocking of Christ ; others are symbolical, a
ship in a storm, Orpheus charming the beasts, and orantes who represent souls rather than persons. One beautiful
vault is decorated by a series of bands, on the lowest of which, on the four
sides, are four typical occupations of the seasons — picking flowers, cutting
corn, the vintage, and gathering olives—while the upper bands are ornamented
successively with pattern-work of roses, corn, vine, and olive.
Amongst the third
century paintings may be noticed Christ enthroned, the Virgin and the Magi, and
Amor and Psyche gathering flowers. In the fourth century Christ is represented
enthroned amidst the twelve apostles, as in the apses of the early basilicas.
In the fifth century the treatment of the figures becomes more rigid and
hieratic, while their costumes are much bejewelled, in a manner distinctly
Byzantine. There is little in the catacomb paintings which has peculiar
application to the grave. The raising of Lazarus or Daniel between the lions
belong to a series of "deliverance" subjects which were in general
use in all forms of Early Christian art; when we come to the fourth and fifth
centuries the decoration resembles that which we are accustomed to in the
churches of those centuries, and the decoration of the earlier catacombs would
have been equally according to the general custom of the time when they were
built. That is, the pre-Constantinian churches and earlier domestic oratories
must have been painted in like fashion with the catacombs. The ideas
underlying the choice of subjects are of resurrection and salvation, thoughts
which are further expressed in the simple epitaphs, which speak of hope, peace,
and eternal welfare. Some of the subjects chosen have, indeed, been compared
with the ancient prayers for the dying, "Deliver, 0 Lord, Thy servant as
Thou didst deliver Enoch and Elias from the common death, as Thou didst deliver
Noah from the Deluge, Job from his torments, Isaac from the Sacrifice, Moses
from the hand of Pharaoh, Daniel from the lions, the three young men from the
furnace, and Susannah from false accusation ... So deign to deliver the soul of
Thy servant."
The orantes, who were figured. with extended arms amidst such scenes,
are types of supplication. They are generally feminine, and are symbols of the
soul in prayer. Thus understood they go far to explain the scope and meaning of
the art of the catacombs.
There is little
sculpture in the round extant from our period, but it is almost surprising that
there is any. The examples are three or four figures of the Good Shepherd
bearing the lamb on His shoulder. The most perfect of these, in the Lateran
Museum, is a sweet pastoral figure. They have been compared with statues of
Hermes bearing the ram. The composition is clearly derived, but the sentiment is
very different. As usual, the Christians were using old symbols in a new
spirit.
The early sarcophagi
furnish us with a series of relief sculptures parallel in extent and interest
to the paintings of the catacombs. Some are so little differentiated from late
classical art that it is hardly possible to say whether they are indeed
Christian. Others have quite a collection of the usual triumph subjects which
appear in the catacombs as paintings. The most noteworthy of all of them is a
fragment, now in the Berlin Museum, which was lately brought from
Constantinople. On it appear Christ and two apostles, standing in niches,
separated by columns. Christ is unbearded and the head has a cruciform nimbus.
The figures, which are about four feet high, are draped in a dignified style
like classical statues of philosophers. This remarkable work has the closest
relation of style with the series of late antique sarcophagi, one of which is
in the Mausoleum Room of the British Museum, another in the Cook Collection at
Richmond. The Berlin relief probably belongs to the third century, and had its
origin at Constantinople or in Asia Minor.
Another famous
sarcophagus is that of Junius Bassus, praefect of Rome, who died in 359. It has
several scenes sculptured on it, amongst which are, Christ enthroned, the Entry
into Jerusalem, Christ brought before Pilate, and Pilate washing his hands;
also Adam and Eve, Daniel, etc. The sculptures are in panels divided by
columns, some of which are covered with scrolls of foliage among which climb amorini. This ornamentation is
noteworthy, as the columns thus decorated resemble the celebrated sculptured
columns at St Peter's which are usually thought to be antique. These columns
formed a screen in front of the altar of Constantine's basilica; they were
saved, and re-used in the new church. The motive of Cupids climbing amidst
vines is also found on the mosaics of Santa Costanza (c. 360) and on many
tombs.
Two more most famous
sarcophagi must be spoken of — those of the Empress Helena and of Santa
Costanza. Both are of royal porphyry with sculptures in high relief, and they
are now in the Vatican. That of the Empress is sculptured with a military
triumph, that of Costanza with amorini and the vintage, peacocks, and lambs. With the latter Strzygowski has lately
compared fragments of other porphyry sarcophagi at Constantinople and
Alexandria, and has shown that they must all have come from Egypt, the land of
the porphyry-quarries and the place of origin of other porphyry sculptures such
as the well-known group at the south-west corner of St Mark's, Venice.
A class of objects which
dates from the time of the catacombs, if not from the apostolic age, is that of
engraved gems. Of these the British Museum has a good representative collection.
"The use of rings as signets or ornaments was as widely spread among the
early Christians as among their Pagan contemporaries. St James speaks of the
man who wears a gold ring and goodly apparel, and the Fathers of the Church
were obliged to reprimand the community for extravagance in this respect."
The devices engraved on these gems are for the most part of a simple symbolic
character as befits the small field which they occupy. In the British Museum
collection we have anchors and fish, doves and trees, sheep, branches of olive
and palm, shepherds' crooks, ships, sacred monograms, the word IXθYC, and
the inscription Vivas in Deo. Of more
pictorial subjects we have the Good Shepherd bearing the sheep, Adam and Eve,
Daniel, Jonah, and the Crucifixion. Two are especially important. One of them
contains quite a collection of the favourite subjects brought together on its
narrow space. The Good Shepherd with the sheep, Daniel and the lions, the dove
with the olive branch, and the story of Jonah, as well as two trees, fish, a
star, and a monogram. The other is probably the earliest representation of the
Crucifixion known, and must date from the third century at latest. On either
side of the Crucified Christ are six much smaller figures, the apostles, and
above is the word IXθYC. M. Brehicr in Les
Origines du Crucifix (1904) suggests that the representation was of Syrian
origin and arose in opposition to merely symbolical interpretations. At South
Kensington there are several Early Christian, Gnostic, and Byzantine rings,
some of which are of importance. One is a ship with the XP monogram on its
sail, another has two saints embracing, probably the Visitation. Another has a
symbolic composition engraved on silver which has been figured by Garrucci and
others. Later writers copy it from Garrucci and seem not to know of its being
preserved now at South Kensington. From a pillar resting on a pyramid of steps
spring branches of foliage above which, in a circle, is a Lamb with the XP
monogram. Below the branches stand two sheep, and two doves fly toward the
tree. It is inscribed IANVARI VIVAS.
Symbols
The elementary symbols
which are found on the engraved rings and all the other objects of art are so
direct and simple, as has been said, that they are still perfectly obvious and
modern. We have the anchor, cross, crook, ship, light-house, fish, and star;
the dove, lamb, drinking harts, palms and olive branches, trees, baskets of
fruit, lamps and candles, chalice, amphora, bowl of milk; the vintage, harvest,
sowing, and fishing ; the shepherd, the orantes,
Eros and Psyche; the Heavenly Sanctuary, the Celestial Banquet, and Garden of
Paradise. Out of this alphabet ideas were built up by combination. Thus we have
a ship with a cross-mast, and the sacred monogram on its sails; another ship on
a stormy sea approaching a light-house; still another ship made fast to land,
bearing vessels of wine and with a dove holding a branch of olive perched on
the rigging. Or we have a Lamb lying at the foot of the Cross, or another
caressing an axe. There are combined anchors and crosses, flowering crosses,
crosses with birds perched on their arms, and crosses rising from a mound from
which flow four rivers.
Larger objects in metal
work must be mentioned, if only that attention may be drawn to the celebrated
Casket of Projecta and the excellent collection of bronze candlesticks and
hanging lamps at the British Museum. The silver toilet casket is entirely Pagan
in style. On the top are the portraits of a husband and bride in a wreath
supported by Cupids. On the front is embossed the Toilet of Venus and a lady
seated between handmaids who bring to her articles of the toilet. At the ends
are nereids; and the smaller spaces are filled by peacocks, doves, and baskets
of fruit. The most interesting subject is that on the back, where the bride is
being led to her new home, a house of two stories covered above by several
domes. The inscription, which is in letters pricked on the plain border, is the
only Christian thing about the work, and it is possible, as in the case of some
of the sarcophagi with Pagan subjects, that it was shop work, and that the
inscription was added for the purchaser. There are many indications that it was
made in Alexandria.
Ivories
We have in our English
museums a remarkably fine collection of Early Christian Ivories. At South
Kensington there is a leaf of a famous diptych, inscribed Symmachorum, the
companion of which in Paris is inscribed Nicomachorum; it is not itself
Christian, but it can be associated with other works which are, and it can be
accurately dated as of the end of the fourth century. It is of extraordinary
beauty both of design and workmanship, and is the most perfect existing example
of marriage diptychs. It was made on the occasion of the marriage of Nicomachus
Flavianus with the daughter of Quintus Aurelius Symmachus, consul in A.D. 391,
or another marriage between the same families in 401.
Now there is an ivory in
the Trivulzio Collection at Milan, sculptured with a representation of the Holy
Sepulchre and watching soldiers, on which some of the details are identical
with the one just spoken of — and a third diptych of the same class, having
exactly similar details, and inscribed with the name of Rufinus Probianus is
now at Berlin. They are all so much alike in style that it would seem that they
must come from one shop and may even be the work of the same hand.
At the British Museum
there are some pieces which formed the sides of a casket which are sculptured
with scenes from the Passion. Some of the subjects have so much in common with
the other ivories just discussed that they may be assigned to the same school.
On these panels are represented Pilate washing his hands, St Peter's Denial,
Christ bearing the Cross, the Crucifixion, Judas hanged, the Women at the
Sepulchre, the incredulity of St Thomas. Pilate washing his hands is a fine
classical composition which may be compared with the same subject on the
Brescia coffer, which also has the Denial of St Peter, and the Death of Judas.
This coffer is acknowledged to be early fourth century work, which is further
confirmed by the fact that on the sarcophagus of Junius Bassus the subject of
Pilate washing his hands is treated in a similar manner. The Brescia coffer has
often been called the most beautiful of Christian Ivories. It has been pointed
out that the cycle of subjects from the Passion represented upon it stops
before the Crucifixion, and it has been held that this omission was a matter o
principle, but the London series, and other still earlier treatments of the
Crucifixion which are now known, contradict this view. The Holy Sepulchre as it
appears on the British Museum fragments is identical with that on the Trivulzio
tablet before mentioned, and the curious costume of the watching soldiers is
alike in both. In both the doors of the tomb are burst open, and in both, on
the panels of the doors, is carved the raising of Lazarus.
These British Museum
panels have been assigned by the Museum authorities to the fifth century, but
there can be little doubt that they should be classed with the other fourth
century works they so closely resemble. They are distinctly earlier in style
than the carved doors of Santa Sabina in Rome which are usually dated about
425.
There are other points
which go to show that these Ivories were wrought in Rome, although possibly by
a school of Eastern ivory-carvers. A domed building practically identical with
the upper part of the Holy Sepulchre on the British Museum Ivory is found on a
fourth century Roman sarcophagus now in the Lateran. While the Trivulzio tablet
has the symbols of the four evangelists appearing in the sky, which are
remarkably similar to the same symbols in the apse mosaic of Santa Pudentiana,
wrought about 390, these symbols hardly appear in Byzantine work, but they do
in Egyptian wall-paintings. Another casket at the Museum which is carved with
the stories of St Peter and St Paul has much in common with the one last
described. Moses striking the Rock seems at first an intrusion amongst these
subjects, but it was in fact a favourite Early Christian type of the Gospel,
and is frequently found in the catacombs; Christ is the Rock, St Peter is the
Moses of the New Law, and the water is that of Baptism. In some cases, indeed,
the name of Peter is written over what appears to be the figure of Moses. This
treatment occurs again engraved on the glass vessel from Cologne in the Museum.
At South Kensington are sides of a casket sculptured with scenes from the Life
of Christ, and known as the Werdan casket. The subjects comprise the
Annunciation, the Angel appearing to Joseph, the Visitation, the Presentation
of the Virgin, the three Shepherds, the Nativity, the Magi, men going out of
Jerusalem toward the Jordan, the axe laid to the root of the tree, the Baptism.
The Annunciation is represented after a form which appears in the Apocryphal
Gospel of St Matthew, according to which the Virgin was drawing water at a
fountain when the angel appeared. The Ox and Ass of the Nativity come from the
same source, as also does the Presentation in the Temple. On this casket Christ
at the Baptism is represented as small and youthful as compared to the Baptist.
Mr Cecil Torr has founded on this the conjecture that an account different from
that in the Gospels was followed, but it may be suggested that it came about
through some stylistic formula like that of the old Egyptian monuments, whereby
some persons might be bigger than others. (Compare three Ivories, 373-5, in
Cabrol's Dictionary.) It is true that we should expect the Christ to be the
dominating figure, but may it not in this instance be the Baptist's office
which is magnified?
A famous ivory
book-cover at Milan has subjects which resemble those of the Werdan casket so
closely that they must have come from the same shop. Except for slight changes
called for by the different spaces to be filled, the Nativity, the Wise Men,
the Shepherds, and the Annunciation, the Presentation of the Virgin, and the baptism,
are all practically identical. There is also at the Bodleian an Ivory of the
same school which contains a Baptism.
The Early Christian
"Gilt Glasses" (Fondi d' oro)
were shallow glass bowls and other vessels decorated with figures,
inscriptions, etc., in gold leaf, the detail drawing being made out by removing
parts of the gold, and the whole fixed by a film of glass fused over the
surface. The subjects show that vessels so ornamented were used alike by
Pagans, Jews, and Christians. They have been more particularly associated with
the latter, as a large number of the decorated medallions which formed the
bottoms of the glasses have been found in the catacombs, where they were stuck
in the plaster, probably as one means of the identification of the loculus. In the fine collection at the
British Museum is a medallion with a figure of the gladiator Stratonicus which,
together with some others, is evidently of pagan origin, and one with the
seven-branched candlestick and other ritual objects of the Temple is Jewish.
In the main the Gilt
Glasses belong to the third and fourth centuries of our era. They were most
popular from c. 300 to c. 350 and few were made after 400. The method of
decoration seems to have originated in the glass-works of Egypt. Many of them
are inscribed ΠIE-ZHCAIC which on others is found in the corrupt form
PIE-ZESES. This suggests a Greek origin, and there is in the British Museum
Christian Collection a fragment of a glass bowl found at Behnesa in Egypt in
1903 which bears part of the earlier form in large engraved letters. In the
Slade Collection, in the Glass Room, there are two most beautiful basins with
exquisitely refined classical decoration in gold. These it is said were
"probably made in Alexandria in the first century, and the method of
ornamentation by designs in gold foil enclosed between two thicknesses of glass
is similar to that employed in the case of Early Christian Gilded
Glasses." Probably the Christian, Jewish, and pagan vessels were sold
together in the same shops. Amongst those at the British Museum, for instance,
there is one with profile heads of St Peter and St Paul, and Christ between,
crowning them. Another has a man and wife with a small figure of Christ
offering them garlands, and the inscription "Long life to thee, sweet
one." Similar pagan compositions show a Cupid or a Hercules between the
husband and bride. The Jewish glass with the golden candlestick also has the
popular inscription "Long Life." The vessels were evidently made use
of largely as memorial, anniversary, or wedding gifts, and some were specially
made with personal inscriptions. Volpel, in his thorough study of these
objects, has shown that where the names of two saints occur on one piece, the
names also come together in the Calendar, as St Agnes and St Vincent of
Zaragoza (21 and 22 January). This goes to confirm the view that they were
prepared for special festivals.
In the British Museum
there are also fragments of a larger glass dish, or paten, decorated with small
medallions of such gilded glass which were made apart and fused into it. Glass
patens were used in the Office of the Mass during the fourth century. At South
Kensington Museum one little medallion, of Christ with the wand of power, is a
replica of one of those on the British Museum paten. With the latter may be
mentioned two beautiful plain blue glass chalices in the Slade Collection. The
Biblical subjects which appear on the Gilt Glasses resemble for the most part
those popular in the catacombs: Adam and Eve, Jonah and the Whale, Daniel, and
so on. Some of the fragments at the British Museum may be restored by a
comparison with other objects. One interesting piece which shews two columns
with a lattice between the lower part, and a lamp hanging above, compared with
a figure in Perate's Manual is seen to have been, when complete, a deceased
person in the attitude of prayer before the heavenly sanctuary. The
inscription, IN DEO, confirms this view. No. 615, which shows the golden
candlestick in the lower half, the upper being lost, must have had the Ark and
the Cherubim in the upper part like another figured by Garrucci. None of these
Gilt Glasses are known to have ever been found in Britain, but fragments of
engraved glass, almost certainly Christian, were found at Silchester. The
fashion for engraved glasses seems to have followed that for those decorated in
gold. Cologne was an important centre for the production of this glass. The
paten above mentioned, and another ornate Gilt Glass, were found there. So also
was the cup with engraved subjects, no. 625, in our national museum ; and
others like it are preserved at Cologne.
Lamps. Linens
The small terracotta
lamps decorated with a cross, monogram, dove, vine, or other symbol, can here
be only mentioned. But a small shallow bowl of glazed ware in the British
Museum must be referred to as one of the most important of Early Christian
works of art. On it appears Christ having a cruciform nimbus, and the face
bearded, the earliest example of the kind, which may be compared with heads of
the more youthful type on some of the Gilt Glasses in the same gallery. On the
bowl there are heads also of Constantine and Fausta on either hand of the chief
figure; they are named in an inscription around the rim and show that it must
have been made before the death of Fausta in 326. Following the analogy of the
Gilt Glasses where a figure of Christ is placed between the portraits of a
husband and wife, may we not suppose that this vessel was made for Constantine
himself? Recently Wilpert has argued against its authenticity, but Strzygowski,
who formerly doubted, is now entirely convinced. It is generally agreed that it
was of Egyptian origin. Most of the objects preserved in our museums show how
freely the Early Christians of the time following the Peace of the Church made
use of various materials in ornamental art. A bishop, indeed, complained that
the weavers rivalled painters in representing animals, flowers, and figures on
their stuffs. Of late years great stores of early textiles have been found
wonderfully preserved under the sands of Egypt, and a fine collection has been
brought together at South Kensington. Some of the earliest figured linens seem
to have been printed. Two of these, at the Museum, are of the Annunciation, and
another shows some scenes from the miracles of Christ, and also Moses receiving
the Law. These stained linen clothes were sometimes figured with pagan
subjects. On the staircase of the Egyptian section at the Louvre there has
recently been exhibited an important piece on which is depicted the story of
Dionysos. In this classical piece we have the same characteristics of style :
big eyes, flowing draperies, inscriptions associated with the figures and even
the large nimbuses.
Architecture
We must now turn from
these smaller objects to the beginnings of Christian architecture. The first
meeting-places of Christians were the private houses where they came together
for the breaking of bread. In the Recognitions of Clement (second century) it
is told that while St Peter was at Antioch, Theophilus, a leading citizen,
turned his house into a basilica, that is, a place of assembly. Some of the
early acts of the martyrs tell how they left their houses to the Church, and so
it came about that certain churches were associated with the names of their
founders, as the churches of Clement, Pudens, and Cecilia in Rome.
Basilica was a word in
very general use, very much like our word Hall, and there is no direct relation
between the basilicas of justice and Christian churches. More true it is that
the greater private houses had triclinia and halls which were themselves called basilicas, and it is probable that these
were actually used for assemblies of Christians. It is possible, further, that
there may be some sympathetic relation between the developed church plan and
the basilica of justice, for the scene of the Heavenly Temple in the Apocalypse
appears to be cast into the form of such a basilica.
The origins of church
fabrics have been worked out in great detail in regard to the possible
prototypes found in private dwellings, but so far as architectural arrangement
goes it is looking for elaborate explanation where but little is required. The
"basilican" type was the appropriate and popular plan for any place
of meeting. It is found in temples as those of Apollo at Gortyna, which had an
apse and internal pillars. In the isle of Samothrace was the temple of the
Cabiri; this was of rectangular plan, it had a portico with an atrium, the
interior was divided into three aisles and at the end was a semicircular niche.
In Rome itself the temples of Venus and Rome are of the same form except that
there is no subdivision of their interiors, and they were surrounded entirely
by the enclosure instead of having an atrium. The temple at Jerusalem and many
Hellenistic temples were in the same way isolated in a court surrounded by a
colonnade. Several of the Christian churches built after the Peace of the
Church were also surrounded by similar colonnaded courts entered through an
outer portico. Orientation certainly derives from temple arrangement, and many
of the earliest churches were built with their entrances facing the East, as
was Herod's temple. Again, the foundations of several synagogues which have
been discovered show a division of the interior into three or five aisles with
three entrance doors in the façade. A description of the synagogue at
Alexandria calls it a basilica, and speaks of its colonnades; it probably had
an apse as well.
The earliest special
places of assembly were the holy sites and the burial chapels of the martyrs.
The subterranean chapels in the catacombs, already mentioned, belong to this
class. Probably the first specifically Christian buildings were Martyria — tomb
chambers, usually round, which were practically memorial churches. During the
course of the third century a large number of churches were built in Syria,
Asia Minor, Armenia, and North Africa. An ancient church at Edessa is said on
good authority to have existed before 201 ; but Edessa was then a Christian
city. A document of 303 mentions "the house where the Christians
assemble," together with its library and triclinium, at Cirta in North
Africa. And another document of 305 says that, as the "basilicas"
had not been repaired, the bishops met in a private house. An episcopal
election, however, was held in area martyrum in casa majore.
An inscription from the
tomb of Bishop Eugenius of Laodicea Combusta has lately been published. He held
the see immediately after the cessation of Diocletian's persecution and speaks
of re-building the whole of his church from its foundations, together with the
colonnaded court which surrounded it. Eusebius speaks of such rebuilding as
general, but says that the new churches were larger and more splendid than
those that had been destroyed. Of the churches built after the imperial
adoption of Christianity only a few of the most famous can be mentioned here.
In and near Jerusalem three churches were built in association with the sacred
sites of the Holy Sepulchre, the Nativity, and the Ascension. All three are
mentioned in 333 as basilicas by a pilgrim from Bordeaux. At the Holy Sepulchre
there was a memorial above the tomb called the Anastsis; and a basilica called
the Great Church, or Martyrium, both included in a precinct called New Jerusalem.
According to Eusebius Constantine first adorned the sacred cave, the chief
point of the whole, with choice columns and other works. The Great Church rose
high within a large court surrounded by porticoes. It was lined within with
marble, the ceiling was carved and gilt woodwork, the roof was covered with
lead. The body of the church was divided by rows of columns into five aisles.
It was entered from the east by three doors; and opposite to these, continues
Eusebius, was the Hemisphere, the crown of the whole work, containing twelve
columns bearing bowls of silver (probably lamps). This "Hemisphere"
would seem to be the dome-building over the tomb, which first was spoken of as
the chief point of the whole. That the anastasis and basilica were separate
buildings is made clear by the account of Etheria (formerly known as St Sylvia)
who, about 380, described the sacred sites. The churches at Bethlehem and the
Mount of Olives were, says Eusebius, built over two sacred caves, one church at
the scene of the Saviour's birth, the second on the mountain top in memory of
His ascension; these two beautiful edifices were dedicated at the two holy
caves. At Bethlehem a noble basilican church still exists which many hold to be
the original edifice, although there is some conflicting evidence that it was either
rebuilt or repaired by Justinian. It is 180 feet long, by 85 feet wide. The
head of the church over the grotto of the Nativity is cruciform, and the nave
is divided into five aisles. The columns are marble with Corinthian capitals
having crosses upon their abaci. The walls above are carried by level beams
instead of arches. To the west was an extensive atrium. A point in favour of
the antiquity of this great church is that the historian Socrates says that the
church at the grotto of the Nativity was not inferior to that of the New
Jerusalem. Constantine's church on the Mount of Olives is generally understood
to be the circular edifice which is known from later descriptions and which
occupied the site of the present church. The pilgrim Etheria, however, says
that the church was at Eleona, "on the Mount from which the Lord ascended,
and in which church is that cave (spelunca) in which the Lord taught the
apostles." From thence pilgrims ascended with hymns to the Imbomon, the
actual place from which the Lord ascended. Now Eusebius, although he speaks of
the church as on the summit, says that in it was the cave where Christ taught
His disciples the sacred mysteries. St Eucharius, a later pilgrim, about 440,
says that there were upon the Mount of Olives two celebrated churches, one
where Christ taught, and the other on the site of the Ascension. The cave site
is known to be below the summit, and remains of buildings have been found
there. From this it seems that Constantine built a church at the cave, and probably
a memorial on the summit. He also built large churches as martyr memorials at
Constantinople, where that of the Apostles is described as high, covered with
marble, and adorned with gilding, and situated in a court having porticoes all
round and chambers opening from them. It was completed about 337. As rebuilt by
Justinian it was a pronounced cross, and there seems to be no doubt that it had
this form from the first. Gregory of Nazianzus speaks of the earlier building
as "the splendid Church of the Apostles divided in the four parts of the
arms of a cross." The account of Eusebius, that it was very high and was
covered above with gilded brass which reflected the sun to a distance, suggests
a dome or a tower at the crossing. That this church was cruciform in shape is
confirmed by the fact that the church of the Apostles built by St Ambrose in
382 at Milan was also a cross. It has been rebuilt and is now St Nazario
Grande, but it is still cruciform. An existing building which may represent the
whole series is the little church of SS. Nazario and Celso, the Mausoleum of
Galla Placidia at Ravenna, which has four equal arms and a tower in the midst.
At Antioch Constantine rebuilt the metropolitan church, which Eusebius describes
as unique in size and beauty, and built in the form of an octagon. It was very
high and decorated with a profusion of gold so that it came to be called the
golden church. Around it was an enclosure of great extent. The great church of
Tyre was also built within a large walled enclosure (peribolos), having a great fore-gate (propylon) toward the east. Within the atrium was a fountain, and
the church was entered through three doors, the centre one of bronze. The
pavement was marble, and it was roofed with cedar. The interior was divided
into aisles by rows of columns (stoai),
the altar-place (thusiasterion) was
screened by lattice-work.
Other churches were
erected at Nicomedia and at Mamre. The former is described as great and
splendid. Such, says Eusebius, were the most noble of the sacred buildings
erected by the Emperor. He only refers to those at the Holy Sites, at the
Emperor's "own city" of Nicomedia, and in the city "which was
called after his own name." He does not mention even his own metropolitan
church of Caesarea, nor does he mention the churches in Rome, much less those
that arose by hundreds all over the Empire. One of these is that of Bishop
Eugenius, referred to above, and further evidence as to them is frequently
being brought to light. Wiegand has lately uncovered the foundations of an
early church at Miletus which may be of Constantine's time.
The Bishop of Rome built
the great basilica of St Peter over the tomb of the apostle. The interior had
five avenues between colonnades crossed at the end by a transept from which
opened the apse raised high above the crypt which contained the apostle's tomb.
Screening the apse were twelve most beautiful columns of spiral form carved on
the surface with amorini climbing
amidst vines. In front of the entrances, which were at the east, was the fine
atrium with a fountain in the centre. The outer gates and the facade, as well
as the apse and the triumphal arch of the interior, were subsequently adorned
with mosaics. The church of St Paul outside the walls was also of the
Constantinian age; but the first church was not of the great scale of that one
which still exists in a restored condition today. Its foundations were exposed
in 1835. It was so small that the length of the church was almost exactly the
same as the width of the present transept. It had its entrances towards the
east and the atrium abutted on the Ostia road. When the great basilica was
built later its orientation was reversed, but its altar, as is usually the
case, yet stands over the site of the older one.
There are still three
buildings in Rome which date from this early period; the Lateran Baptistery,
the basilica of Santa Agnese, and the attached tomb-church of Santa Costanza.
Santa Agnese is a most beautiful type of church having arcaded galleries within,
around the two sides and the end opposite the apse. It is sunk into the ground
to the level of the catacombs in which the saint was buried, and these are entered
from a door in the sidewall, the descent into the church being by a long flight
of steps. The church is nine bays long, and the columns are of marble. The apse
is lined with marble and porphyry, and in the midst is the bishop's throne.
Above, in the conch, is a fine mosaic, but not so ancient. Close by, but at the
higher level of the natural ground, stands Santa Costanza, built about 354. It
is circular, with an inner ring of columns which supported a dome. The diameter
is about 76 feet, and the columns are only about 18 feet high. They are mostly
of grey granite. The walls were sheeted with marble and the annular aisle has
its vaults covered with mosaic, chiefly of pattern-work, but in some places
there are vintage scenes with amorini gathering the grapes and making wine.
Mosaics
The most splendid
feature of the early churches was the mosaic work which from the Constantinian
age adorned their vaults and especially the conches of their apses. Such
mosaics were generally formed of small cubes of glass variously coloured and
gilded. At the same time mosaics of marble of the more ordinary Roman kind were
used for floors. The glass mosaics and even gilt tesserae had been employed under the Roman Empire. Glass is found
so far West as Cirencester, where small parts of a floor are of that material.
Gold mosaic has been found on the vaults of the Baths of Caracalla and of the
Palatine Palace; also in North Africa. Quite recently a mosaic having gilt
cubes has been found at Pompeii. It is next to certain that, like the vessels
of gilded glass, this kind of mosaic came from the factories of Egypt. There is
in the British Museum a small glass plaque, decorated with a flowering plant of
several colours fused into its substance. This was found in London, while
similar pieces, now at South Kensington, have lately been discovered at Behnesa
in Egypt. The earliest existing Christian mosaics are those of the vaults of
the round church of Santa Costanza in Rome. Besides the mosaics mentioned above
there are two small, much injured, conches which display figure subjects. In
one of them God the Father gives the ancient Law to Moses, and in the other St
Peter receives the new Law from the hand of Christ. The whole of the central
dome was once covered with mosaic, but of this only a slight drawing is now
preserved.
The next mosaic in point
of date, but more interesting and beautiful as a work of art, fills the apse of
the basilica of Santa Pudentiana. This church, not far from the better known
Santa Maria Maggiore, is deeply sunk in the ground, itself a mark of a
primitive foundation. The apse mosaic forms part of a work undertaken about
390. On it Christ sits enthroned in the midst of a semicircle of apostles,
while behind St Peter and St Paul stand two female figures robed in white and
holding crowns ; these are interpreted as the Churches of the Circumcision and of
the Gentiles. Behind Christ on a mountain stands a vast jewelled cross, and on
the sky are the four symbolic beasts. This noble work still retains much of
classical grace, the fixity characteristic of Byzantine art is entirely absent.
The colour, .also, is fair and extremely beautiful, gold being used to
illuminate the high lights of the draperies and other parts, but not in broad
fields as in the later mosaics.
Art in Britain
It is desirable to
include here some account of Early Christian art in Britain. The discovery,
about twelve years ago, of the perfect plan of a small early basilican church
at Silchester makes more certain than anything else had done the existence of
recognised Christian communities in British cities. The Silchester church occupied
an important position near the civil basilica, but in itself was quite small.
It had a nave about ten feet wide and aisles five feet; the length, including
the apse, which was at the west end, was about thirty feet. The aisles had a
small additional projection at the end next the apse, which made the whole plan
cruciform. At the east end was a narthex, and in front of that a court with a
fountain in the centre. The position of the altar in the apse was marked by a
square of pattern-work in the mosaic floor. This pattern, of the chess-board
type, is in quarters, what heralds call quarterly. A very accurate model of
this important relic is now in the Reading Museum.
Art in Britain
It is well known that
the XP monogram appeared on a mosaic floor found about a century ago at
Frampton, and figured by Lysons. The monogram occurred in the centre of a band
of ornament which separated an apse from a square compartment. Lysons thought
that the general style of the ornaments of the apse seemed "inferior to
that of the square part," and spoke of the monogram as
"inserted." The last writer on Christian antiquities in Britain, in
Cabrol's great Dictionary, says that the monogram must have been
"inserted" at some time not earlier than the middle of the fourth
century. Lysons tried to suggest, being interested in the Roman art point of
view, that the pavement was pre-Constantinian, but he himself remarked that
the pattern on a neighbouring area occurred also on the vault mosaics of Santa
Costanza at Rome, a work of the second half of the fourth century. This is,
probably, the date of the whole of the Frampton mosaics, and a consideration of
the sequence of the turns of the scroll ornament in the middle of which the
monogram was found shews that the scroll-work and the symbol certainly formed
part of one design. The only other subject figured on the floor of the apse,
excepting patterns, was a single vase or chalice in the middle. At the Roman
villa at Chedworth again the XP monogram has been found cut in the foundation
stones of some steps. In the museum on the site there is also a small plain
stone cross.
Mr Romilly Allen
suggested that "two other Roman pavements found in this country may
possibly be Christian"; — that at Harpole which has a circle in the middle
divided into eight parts by radial lines so as to resemble one form of the
monogram of Christ, and that at Horkstow which has "some small red crosses
in the decoration." The latter not only has the crosses, but at the centre
is Orpheus playing the lyre, a subject frequently found in Early Christian art.
The writer in Cabrol's Dictionary has independently come to the conclusion that
this mosaic is Christian. "It has passed unrecognized," he says,
"but we have no doubt of its Christian origin." Now, if this mosaic
with the catacomb subject of Orpheus and the beasts is Christian, is it not
probable that the several other British mosaics which display the same subject are
also works of Christian art? All these mosaics probably date from about 350,
when the Church must have been a recognised institution in every city, and it
is difficult to think that the subject, once Christianized, should have been
employed in another sense. An Orpheus pavement was found at Littlecote Park,
Ramsbury, at the centre of a triapsidal apartment resembling the Roman
Christian burial chapels. Yet another pavement, at Stourton, had a quartered
design practically identical with that of the altar space of the Silchester
basilica. The subject of Orpheus is known to have occurred four times in the
catacombs, but none of these appear to have been later than the third century,
and it has indeed been suggested that the subject was taken over in profane
art, especially in Gaul and Britain, but this is unproven, and in any case we
get the Christian influence. Several British pavements are known in which
ornamental cross-forms appear. It has been said that these cannot be Christian,
as the cross symbol did not come into general use at so early a time. But the
many instances which have now been found contradicting this view reopen the
question. With those Roman objects having crosses which have been found in
England may be mentioned the chain-bracelet with an attached cross. A
comparison with fig. 1606 in Cabrol's Dictionary makes it almost certain that
it is Christian. Perhaps the most important Christian documents found in
Britain are ingots of pewter found in the Thames at Battersea which are stamped
several times over with the XP monogram surrounded by the words, Spes in Deo. These look like official
marks.
When a full history of
Early Christian art in Britain is written it will be seen that it shared in the
great movement of the time, although of course it was second to Gaul and third
to Italy.
 |
|
|