| |
ATTILA, KING OF THE HUNS.
21.
Capture of Margus, Viminacium, Ratiara
It is exceedingly difficult to adjust the dates and particulars of the
several events that are mentioned by different writers. The capture of Margus
and Viminacium, which seems to have been the first act of hostility against
Theodosius, has been referred by Belius to the year 434, immediately after the
reduction of the Sorosgi, but it is not credible that Margus should have been
captured by the Huns, immediately after the peace concluded there. On the
contrary, the account of Priscus makes it evident that those events directly
preceded a more important attack on the dominions of Theodosius, and they are
clearly referable to the year 439, following immediately the disaster of
Litorius in Gaul. During the security of a great annual fair in the neighborhood
of the Danube, the Hunnish army fell unexpectedly on the Roman, seized on the
fortress which protected them, and slew a great number of their people.
Remonstrances were made concerning this flagrant breach of faith, but the Huns
replied, that they were by no means the aggressors, because the bishop of
Margus had entered their territory, and pillaged the royal domain; and that,
unless he was immediately delivered into their hands, together with all the
fugitives whom the Romans were bound by treaty to give up, they would prosecute
the war with greater severity. The Romans denied the truth of their complaint,
but the Huns, confident in their assertion, declined entering into proofs of
their accusation, and, having crossed the Danube, carried war and devastation
into the forts and cities of their enemies, and, amongst others of less
importance, they captured Viminacium, a Mysian city in Illyria. So fallen was
the spirit and vigour of the Roman empire, that, notwithstanding the alleged
innocence of the bishop of Margus, it began to be pretty loudly suggested that
he ought rather to be delivered up to the vengeance of the barbarians, than the
whole territory of the empire exposed to their atrocities. The bishop, aware of
his perilous situation, secretly passed over to the enemy, and offered to
deliver up the town, if the Scythian princes would enter into terms with him.
They promised him every possible advantage, if he would make good his proposal,
pledging their hands and confirming the agreement by oaths; whereupon the
bishop returned into the Roman territory with a great force of Huns, and having
placed them opposite the bank of the river in ambush, in the night time he
arose at the appointed signal, and delivered up the town to its enemies. Margus
having been thus taken and sacked by the Huns, they became daily more
formidable, and waxed in strength and insolence.
In the following year (441) Attila collected an army consisting
specially of his own Huns, and wrote to the emperor Theodosius concerning the
fugitives in the Roman territory and the tribute which had been withheld from
him on occasion of the war, demanding that they should be instantly delivered
up, and ambassadors sent to arrange with him concerning the payments to be made
in future; and he added that if they made any delay or warlike preparations, he
should not be able to restrain the impetuosity of his people. Theodosius showed
no disposition to submit; he peremptorily refused to yield up the refugees, and
answered that he would abide the event of warfare, but that he would
nevertheless send ambassadors to reconcile their differences, if possible.
Thereupon Senator, a man of consular dignity, was sent by the emperor to treat
with Attila; he did not however venture to traverse the territory of the Huns
even under the protection of the character of an ambassador, but sailed across
the Euxine to Odessus, the modern Odessa, situated near Oczakow on its northern
extremity, where the general Theodulus, who had been despatched on a like
mission, was at that time abiding, without having succeeded in obtaining an
audience. In what quarter Attila was then stationed, is not recorded, but he
had probably advanced with his army, before the negociator reached his
destination; for on the receipt of the answer of Theodosius, being greatly
incensed, he made an immediate and sanguinary irruption into the Roman
dependencies, and, having taken several fortresses, he overwhelmed Ratiaria, a
city of great magnitude and very populous, which stood near the site of Artzar,
a little below Vidin on the Danube. He was accompanied by his brother on this
inroad, and they laid waste a great part of Illyria, demolishing Naissus,
(Nissa) Singidunum, (Belgrade) and other flourishing towns. Seven years after,
the sophist Priscus on his embassy to the court of Attila, passed by the
desolated site of Naissus, and saw the ruins of that exterminated town, and the
country strewed with the bones of its inhabitants.
22. Comet
and pestilence in 44. Defeat of Arnegisclus at the Chersonese. Peace concluded
by Anatolius
The succeeding campaign was ushered in by the appearance of a comet of
great magnitude, which added to the terror of the Hunnish arms, and a fatal
pestilence raged throughout Europe. The brothers renewed the ravage of Illyria,
and stretched their victorious course to the extreme shores of Thrace. In this
expedition only we hear of Persians serving under Attila together with Saracens
and Isaurians, but it is certain that no part of Persia was reduced under his
dominion, though the Bactrian king of the Caucasean Paropamisus is said to have
been amongst his military vassals.
Arnegisclus was entrusted by Theodosius with
a great army to stop the progress of the invader, but he was completely routed
on the shore of the Chersonese; the enemy approached within twenty miles of Constantinople,
and almost all the cities of Thrace, except Adrianople and Heraclea, submitted
to the conqueror. The army, which was quartered in Sicily for the protection of
the eastern provinces, was hastily recalled for the defence of Constantinople,
and Aspar and Anatolius, masters of the forces, were sent to negotiate with the
invaders, whose progress they had small hope of arresting in the field of
battle. A treaty or rather a truce for a year was concluded with the Huns
by Anatolius, according to which the Romans consented to give up the fugitives,
to pay 6000 pounds weight of gold for the arrears of tribute, and the future
tribute was assessed at 2100 pounds of gold; twelve pieces of gold were to be
the ransom of every Roman prisoner who had escaped from his chains, and on
default of payment he was to be sent back to captivity. The Romans were
also compelled to pledge themselves to admit no refugees from the dominions of
the Huns within the limits of the empire.
The ambassadors of Theodosius, too haughty to acknowledge the grievous
necessity to which they were reduced, of accepting whatever terms the conqueror
might think fit to impose, pretended to make all these concessions willingly;
but, through excessive dread of their adversaries, peace upon
any conditions was their paramount object, and it was needful to submit to the
imposition of such a heavy tribute, though the wealth not only of individuals,
but of the public treasury, had been dissipated in unseasonable shows, in
reprehensible canvassing for dignities, in luxurious and immoderate
expenditure, which would not only have been misbecoming a prudent government in
the most prosperous affluence, but was especially unfitting for those
degenerate Romans, who, having neglected the discipline of war, had been
tributary not only to the Huns, but to every barbarian that pressed upon the
several frontiers of the empire.
The emperor levied with the greatest rigor
the taxes and assessments which were necessary to furnish the stipulated
tribute to the Huns, and those even whose lands, on account of the destructive
inroads of the barbarians, had been for a while discharged from the payment of
taxes, either by a judicial decision, or by
imperial indulgence, were compelled to contribute. The senators
paid into the treasury the gold which was required from them beyond their
means, and their eminent situation was the cause of ruin to many of them; for
those, who were appointed by the emperor to levy the rate, exacted it with
insolence, so that many persons, who had been in affluent circumstances,
were forced to sell their furniture and the trinkets and
apparel of the women. So grievous was the calamity of this peace to the
Romans, that many hanged themselves in despair, or perished by voluntary
starvation. The treasury being immediately emptied, the gold and the
fugitives were sent to the Huns, Scottas having
arrived at Constantinople from the court of
Attila to receive them. Many however of the fugitives, who would not
surrender to be delivered up to their inexorable countrymen, from whose hands
they would have suffered a cruel and lingering death, were slain by the Romans
to propitiate the enemy; and amongst those were some of the blood royal of
Scythia, who, refusing to serve under Attila, had fled to the Romans.
 |
|