| |
CHARLES THE BOLD
II
YOUTH
1440-1453
The
heir of Burgundy was still in very tender years when he began to take official
part in public affairs, sometimes associated with one parent, sometimes with
the other.
There
was a practical advantage in bringing the boy to the fore by which the duke was
glad to profit. With his own manifold interests, it was impossible for him to
be present in his various capitals as often as was demanded by the usage of the
diverse individual seigniories. It was politic, therefore, to magnify the
representative capacity of his son and of his consort in order to obtain the
grants and aides which certain of his subjects declared could be given
only when requested orally by their sovereign lord. Thus, in 1444, it was Count
Charles and the duchess who appeared in Holland to ask an aide. In the following year, Charles accompanied his father when Philip made
one of his rare visitsthere were only three between 1428
and 1466to Holland and Zealand.
Olivier
de la Marche was among the attendants on this occasion, and he describes with
great detail how rejoiced were the inhabitants to have their absentee count in
their land. Many matters could only be set aright by his authority. Among the complaints
brought to him at Middelburg were accusations against a certain knight of high
birth, Jehan de Dombourc. Philip ordered that the man be arrested at once and
brought before him for trial. This was easier said than done. Warned of his
danger, Dombourc, with four or five comrades, took refuge in the clock tower of
the church of the Cordeliers, a sanctuary that could not be taken by storm. He was provided with a good store of food, this audacious criminal, and
prepared to stand a siege. There he remained three days, because, for the
honour of the Church, they could not fire upon him.
"And
I remember [adds La Marche] seeing a nun come out and call to Jehan Dombourc,
her brother, advising him to perish defending himself rather than to dishonour
their lineage by falling into the hands of the executioner. Nevertheless,
finally he was forced to surrender to his prince, and he was beheaded in the
market-place at Middelburg, but, at the plea of his sister, the said nun, his
body was delivered to her to be buried in consecrated ground."
In
this same visit Philip presided over the Zealand estates and the young count
sat by his side, not as an idle spectator, but because usage required the
presence of the heir as well as that of the Count of Zealand.
When
Charles was twelve he was present at an assembly of the Order of the Golden
Fleece held in Ghent. It was the first occasion of the kind witnessed by La
Marche, and very minute is his description of the lavish magnificence of the
affair, undoubtedly intended to awe the citizens into complying with the
requests of their Count of Flanders.
Charles
played a prominent part in all the functions, and assisted in the election of
his tutor, Seigneur et Ber d'Auxy. Another candidate of that year was Frank van
Borselen, Count of Ostrevant, widower of Jacqueline, late Countess of Holland.
In
1446, the little Countess of Charolais died at Brussels. "Honourably as
befitted a king's daughter" was she buried at Ste. Gudule.
"Tireless
in their devotion were the duke and duchess in her last illness, and Charles
VII. despatched two skilled doctors to her aid but all efforts were vain.
"Much
bemourned was the princess for she was virtuous. God have pity on her
soul"
piously
ejaculates La Marche.
A
little item in the accounts suggests that a pleasant friendship had existed between
the two young people:
"To
Jehan de la Court, harper of Mme. the Countess of Charolais, for a harp which
she had bought from him and given to Ms. the Count of Charolais for him to play
and take his amusement, XII francs."
It
is easy to surmise that music was not, however, the young count's favourite
amusement. In Philip's court, tournaments were still held and afforded a
fascinating entertainment for a lad whose bent was undoubtedly towards a
military career.
One
valiant actor in these tourneys where were revived the ancient traditions of
knighthood, was Jacques de Lalaing, a chevalier with all the characteristics of
times past, fighting for fame in the present. In his youth, this aspirant for
reputation swore a vow to meet thirty knights in combat before he attained his
thirtieth year. Dominated by a desire to fulfil his vow, Lalaing haunted the
court of Burgundy, because the Netherlands were on the highroad between England
and many points in Germany, Italy, and the East, and there he had the best
chance of falling in with all the prowess that might be abroad. For
stay-at-home prowess he cared naught. A delightful
personage is Messire Jacques and a brave rôle does he play in the series of
jousts, sporting gaily on the pages of the various Burgundian chroniclers, who
recorded in their old age what they had seen in their youth. One description,
however, of these encounters reads much like another and they need not be
repeated.
During
his childhood Charles was a spectator only on the days of mimic battle. In his
seventeenth year he was permitted to enter the lists as a regular combatant, a
permission shared by his fellow pupils all eager to flesh their maiden spears.
The duke arranged that his son should have a preliminary tilt a few days before
the public affair in order to test his ability. All the courtiersand apparently ladies were not excluded from the discussion on the matteragreed that no better knight could be found for this purpose than
Jacques de Lalaing, who, on his part, was highly honoured by being selected to
gauge the untried capabilities of the prince.
In
the park at Brussels with the duke and duchess as onlookers, the preliminary
encounter took place. At the very first attack, Charles struck Messire Jacques
on the shield and shattered his lance into many pieces. The duke was displeased
because he thought that the knight had not exerted his full strength and was
favouring his son. He accordingly sent word to Jacques that he must play
in earnest and not hold his force in leash. Fresh lances were brought; again
did the count withstand the attack so sturdily that both lances were shattered.
This time the boy's mother was the dissatisfied one, thinking that the knight
was too hard with his junior, but the duke only laughed.
"Thus
differed the parents. The one desired him to prove his manhood, the other was
preoccupied with his safety. With these two courses the trial ended amid rounds
of applause for the prince."
The
actual tourney was held on the Marketplace in Brussels before a distinguished
assembly. Count Charles was escorted into the arena by his cousin, the Count
d'Estampes, and other nobles. Seigneur d'Auxy, his tutor, stood near to watch
the maiden efforts of the prince and his mates. He had reason to be proud of
Charles, both for his bearing and his skill. He gave and received excellent
thrusts, broke more than ten lances, and did his duty so valiantly that in the
evening he received the prize from two princesses, and "Montjoye" was
cried by the heralds in his honour. From that time forth, the count was
considered a puissant and rude jouster and gained great renown.
"And
that is the reason why I commence my memoirs about him and his deeds [continues La Marche, on concluding his description of the tournament],
and I do not speak from hearsay and rumour. As one who has been brought up with
him from his youth in his father's service and in his own, I will touch upon
his education, his morals, his character, and his habits from the moment when I
first saw him as appears above in my memoirs.
"As
to his character, I will commence at the worst features. He was hot, active,
and impetuous: as a child he was very eager to have his own way. Nevertheless,
he had so much understanding and good sense that he resisted his inclinations
and in his youth no one could be found sweeter or more courteous than he. He
did not take the name of God or the saints in vain, and held God in great fear
and reverence. He learned well and had a retentive memory. He was fond of
reading and of hearing read the stories of Lancelot and Gawain, but to both he
preferred the sea and boats. Falconry, too, he loved and he hunted whenever he
had leave. In archery he early excelled his comrades and was good at other
sports. Thus was the count educated, trained, and taught, and thus did he
devote himself to good and excellent exercise."
That
the report of the lavishness and extravagance of the Burgundian court was no
idle rumour, exaggerated by frequent repetitions, is attested to by every bit
of contemporary evidence. Enthusiastic and loyal chroniclers dwell on the
magnificence, and the arid details of bills paid show what it cost to attain
the vaunted perfection, while the protests from taxpayers prove that this
splendour did not grow like the lilies of the field.
Philip's
treasury had many separate compartments. There were many quarters to which he
could turn for his needed supplies, but there were times when his exchequer ran
very threateningly low, and his financial stress led him to be very
conciliatory towards the burghers with full purses.
In
1445, Ghent had been honoured by the celebration of the feast of the Order of
the Golden Fleece within her gates. Two years later, Philip appeared in person
at a meeting of the collace, or municipal assembly, and delivered a
harangue to the Ghentish magistrates and burghers, flattering them, moreover,
by using their vernacular. The tenor of this speech was as follows:
"My
good and faithful friends, you know how I have been brought up among you from
my infancy. That is why I have always loved you more than the inhabitants of
all my other cities, and I have proved this by acceding to all your requests. I
believe then that I am justified in hoping that you will not abandon me to-day
when I have need of your support. Doubtless you are not ignorant of the
condition of my father's treasury at the period of his death. The majority of
his possessions had been sold. His jewels were in pawn. Nevertheless, the
demands of a legitimate vengeance compelled me to undertake a long and bloody
war, during which the defence of my fortresses and of my cities, and the pay of
my army have necessitated outlays so large that it is impossible to estimate
them. You know, too, that at the very moment when the war on France was at its
height, I was obliged, in order to assure the protection of my country of
Flanders, to take arms against the English in Hainaut, in Zealand, and in
Friesland, a proceeding costing me more than 10,000 saluts d'or, which I
raised with difficulty. Was I not equally obliged to proceed against Liege, in
behalf of my countship of Namur, which sprang from the bosom of Flanders? It is
not necessary to add to all these outlays those which I assume daily for the
cause of the Christians in Jerusalem, and the maintenance of the Holy
Sepulchre.
"It
is true, however, that, yielding to the persuasions of the pope and the
Council, I have now consented to put an end to the evils multiplied by war by
forgetting my father's death, and by reconciling myself with the king. Since
the conclusion of this treaty, I considered that while I had succeeded in
preserving to my subjects during the war the advantages of industry and of
peace, they had submitted to heavy burdens in taxes and in voluntary
contributions, and that it was my duty to re-establish order and justice in the
administration. But everything went on as though the war had not ceased. All my
frontiers have been menaced, and I found myself obliged to make good my rights
in Luxemburg, so useful to the defence of my other lands, especially of Brabant
and Flanders.
"In
this way, my expenses continued to increase; all my resources are now
exhausted, and the saddest part of it all is that the good cities and communes
of Flanders and especially the country folk are at the very end of their
sacrifices. With grief I see many of my subjects unable to pay their taxes, and
obliged to emigrate. Nevertheless, my receipts are so scanty that I have little
advantage from them. Nor do I reap more from my hereditary lands, for all are
equally impoverished.
"A
way must be found to ease the poor people, and at the same time to protect
Flanders from insult, Flanders for whose sake I would risk my own person,
although to arrive at this end, important measures have become
imperative."
After
this affectionate preamble, Philip finally states that, in order to raise the
requisite revenues, no method seemed to him so good and so simple as a tax on
salt, three sous on every measure for a term of twelve years. He promised to
dispense with all other subsidies and to make his son swear to demand nothing
further as long as the gabelle was imposed.
"Know
[he added in conclusion] that even if you consent to it I will renounce it if
others prove of a different opinion, for I do not desire that the communes of
Flanders be more heavily weighted than any other portion of my territory."
The
duke might have spared his trouble and his elaborate condescension. The answer
to his conciliatory request was a flat refusal to consider the matter at all.
Salt was a vital necessity to Flemish fisheries, and its cost could not be
increased to the least degree without serious inconvenience. The Flemings were
wroth at his imitating the worst custom of his French
kinsmen.
Philip
departed from Ghent in great dudgeon. After a time he was persuaded that the
indisposition of the town to meet his reasonable wishes was not due to the
citizens at large, but to the machinations of a few unruly agitators among the
magistrates. In 1449, therefore, he took a high-handed course of trying to
direct the issue of the regular municipal elections, so as to ensure the choice
of magistrates on whose obedience he could rely. The appearance of Burgundian
troops in Ghent, before the election of mid-August, aroused the wrath of the
community, who thought that their most cherished franchises were in jeopardy.
This
was the beginning of a bitter struggle between Ghent and Philip. The duke found
it no light matter to coerce the independent burghers into remembering that
they were simply part of the Burgundian state. "Tantæ molis erat
liberam gentem in servitutem adigere!" ejaculates Meyer in the midst
of his chronicle of the details of fourteen months of active hostilities. Matters were long in coming to an outbreak. Various points had been
contended over, when Philip had endeavoured to change the seat of the great
council, or to take divers measures tending to concentrate certain judicial or
legislative functions for his own convenience, but in a manner prejudicial to
the autonomy of Ghent. His centripetal policy was disliked, but when his policy
went further, and he attempted to control purely civic offices, dislike grew
into resentment and the Ghenters rose in open revolt.
For
a time, their opposition passed in Philip's estimation as mere insignificant
unruliness. By 1452, however, the date of the tourney above described, it
became evident that a vital issue was at stake. The Estates of Flanders
endeavoured to mediate between overlord and town, but without success. Owing to
Philip's interference in the elections, the results were declared void, and
when a new election was appointed, the Burgundians accused the city of hastily
augmenting its number of legal voters by over-facile naturalisation laws. The
gilds, too, evinced a readiness to be very lenient in their scrutiny of
candidates for admission to their cherished privileges, preferring, for the
nonce, numbers to quality. Occupancy of furnished rooms was declared sufficient
for enfranchisement, and there were cases where mere guests of a bourgeois were
hastily recorded on the lists as full-fledged citizens.
By
these means the popular party waxed very strong numerically. The sheriffs found
themselves quite unequal to holding the rampant spirit of democracy in check.
The regular government was overthrown, and the demagogues succeeded in electing
three captains (hooftmans) invested with arbitrary power for the time
being. The decrees of the ex-sheriffs were suspended, and a mass of very
radical measures promulgated and joyfully confirmed
by the populace, assembled on the Friday market. It was to be the judgment of
the town meeting that ruled, not deputed authority. One ordinance stipulated
that at the sound of the bell every burgher must hasten to the marketplace, to
lend his voice to the deliberations.
For
a time various negotiations went on between Philip and envoys from Ghent. The
latter took a high hand and insinuated in unmistakable terms that if the duke
refused an accommodation with them, they would appeal to their suzerain, the
King of France. No act of rebellion, overt or covert, exasperated Philip more
than this suggestion. Charles VII. was only too ready to ignore those clauses
in the treaty of Arras, releasing the duke from homage, and virtually
acknowledging his complete independence in his French territories. The king
accepted missives from his late vassal's city, without reprimanding the writers
for their presumption in signing themselves "Seigneurs of Ghent." His action, however, was confined to mild attempts at mediation.
It
was plain to the duke that his other towns would follow Ghent's resistance to
his authority if there were hopes of her success. Therefore he threw aside all
other interests for the time being, and exerted himself to levy a body of
troops to crush Flemish pretensions. His counsellors advised him
to sound the temper of other citizens and to ascertain whether their sympathies
were with Ghent. Answers of feeble loyalty came back to him from the majority
of the other towns. Undoubtedly they highly approved Ghent's efforts. They,
too, could not afford to pay taxes fraught with danger to their commerce, nor
to relinquish one jot of privileges dearly bought at successive crises
throughout a long period of years. The only doubt in their minds was as to the
ultimate success of the burghers to stem the course of Burgundian usurpation.
Therefore, they first hedged, and then consented to aid the duke. This course
was pursued by the Hollanders and the Zealanders, all alike short-sighted.
The
Ghenters succeeded in possessing themselves of the castle of Poucque by force,
and of the village of Gaveren by stratagem, taking advantage in the latter case
of the castellan's absence at church.
When
every part of his dominions had been canvassed for troops, and Philip was
prepared for his first active campaign against Ghent, he was anxious to leave
his heir under the protection of the duchess, conscious that the imminent
contest would be bitter and deadly. A pretence was made that the young count's
accoutrements were not ready, and that, therefore, he would have to remain in
Brussels.
"But
he whose ambitions waxed, hastened the completion of his accoutrements, and
swore by St. George, the greatest oath he ever used, that he would rather go
in his shirt than not accompany his father to punish his impudent rebel
subjects."
The
approaching hostilities were watched by foreign merchants in dread of
commercial disaster.
"On
May 18th, the nations of the merchants of Bruges departed thence to go to Ghent to try to
make peace between that city and the Duke of Burgundy, and there were nations of Spain, Aragon, Portugal, and Scotland, besides the Venetians, Milanese,
Genoese, and Luccans."
But
the men of Ghent were beyond the point where commercial arguments could stem
their course. The very day that this company arrived in the city, the burghers
sallied forth six or seven thousand strong, fully equipped for offensive
warfare.
Both
the actual engagements and guerilla skirmishes that raged over a minute stretch
of territory were characterised by an extraordinary ferocity. Around Oudenarde,
which town Philip was determined to relieve, men were beheaded like sheep.
In
the first regular engagement in which Charles took part, he showed a brave
front and learned the duties of a prince by rewarding others with the honour of
knighthood. Among those slain in the course of the war, were Cornelius, Bastard
of Burgundy, and the gallant Jacques de Lalaing. Philip grieved
deeply over the death of the former, his favourite among his natural sons, and
buried him with all honours in the Church of Ste-Gudule in Brussels. The title
by which he was known, hardly a proud one it would seem, passed to his brother
Anthony. Lalaing, too, was greatly mourned, thus prematurely cut down in his
thirty-third year.
There
was so much fear lest the duke's sole legitimate heir might also perish in
these conflicts where there was no mercy, that Charles was persuaded to go to
visit his mother in the hope that she would keep him by her side. She made a
feast in his honour, but, to the surprise of all, the duchess, who had wished
to protect her son from the mild perils of a tourney, now encouraged him with
brave words to return to fight in all earnest for his inheritance. He himself was very indignant at the efforts to treat him as a child.
The
first truce and negotiations for peace, initiated in the summer of 1452, were
broken off because the conditions were unbearable to the Ghenters. Another year
of warfare followed before the decisive battle of Gaveren, in July, 1453,
forced them sadly to succumb. There was no other course open to them. Not only
were they defeated but their numbers were decimated. With full allowance for exaggeration, it is certain that the loss
was very heavy. Terms scornfully rejected at an earlier date were, in 1453,
accepted with every humiliating detail. More, the defeated rebels were bidden
to be grateful that their kind sovereign had imposed nothing further to the
conditions. As to abating the severity of the articles, he declared that he
would not change an a for a b.
The
chief provisions were as follows: The deans of the gilds were deprived of
participation in the election of sheriffs. The privileges of the naturalisation
laws were considerably abridged. No sentence of banishment could be pronounced
without the intervention of the duke's bailiff, whose authorisation, too, was
required before the publication of edicts, ordinances, etc. The sheriffs were
forbidden to place their names at the head of letters to the officers of the
duke. The banners were to be delivered to the duke and placed under five locks,
whose several keys should be deposited with as many different people, without
whose consensus the banners could not be brought forth to lead the burghers to
sedition. One gate was to be closed every Thursday in memory of the day when
the citizens had marched through it to attack their liege lord, and another was
to be barred up in perpetuity or at the pleasure of their sovereign. To
reimburse the duke for his enforced outlay, a heavy indemnity was to be paid by
the city.
July
30th was the date appointed for the final act of submission, the amende
honorable of the unfortunate city. The scene was very similar to that
played at Bruges in 1440. Two thousand citizens headed by the sheriffs,
councillors, and captains of the burgher guard met the duke and his suite a
league without the walls of Ghent. Bareheaded, barefooted, and divested of all
their robes of office and of dignity, clad only in shirts and small clothes,
these magistrates confessed that they had wronged their loving lord by unruly
rebellion, and begged his pardon most humbly.
The
duke spent the night of July 29th at Gaveren, prepared to march out in the
morning with his whole army in handsome array. Philip was magnificently
apparelled, but he rode the same horse which he had used on the day of battle,
with the various wounds received on that day ostentatiously plastered over to make
a dramatic show of what the injured sovereign had suffered at the hands of his
disloyal subjects.
The
civic procession was headed by the Abbot of St. Bavon and the Prior of the
Carthusians. The burghers who followed the half-clad officials were fully dressed
but they, too, were barefoot and ungirdled. All prostrated themselves in the
dust and cried, "Mercy on the town of Ghent." While they were thus
prostrate, the town spokesman of the council made an elaborate speech in
French, assuring the duke that if, out of his benign grace. he would take his
loving and repentant subjects again into his favour, they
would never again give him cause for reproach.
"At
the conclusion of this harangue, the duke and the Count of Charolais, there
present, pardoned the petitioners for their evil deeds. The men of Ghent
re-entered their town more happy and rejoiced than can be expressed, and the
duke departed for Lille, having disbanded his army, that every one might return
to their several homes."
The
joy experienced by the conquered, here described by La Marche, as he looked
back at the event from the calm retirement of his old age, was not visible to
all eye-witnesses. The progress of this war was watched eagerly from other
parts of Philip's dominion. His army was full of men from both the Burgundies,
who sent frequent reports to their own homes. Some passages from one of these
reports by an unknown war correspondent run as follows:
"As
to news from here, Monday after St. Magdalen's Day, Monseigneur the duke got
the better of the Ghenters near Gaveren between ten and eleven o'clock. They
attacked him near his quarters.... The duke risked his own person in advance of
his company in the very worst of the slaughter, which lasted from the said
place up to Ghent, a distance of about two leagues. The slain number three or
four thousand, more or less, and those drowned in the river of Quaux about two
hundred.... This Tuesday, the date of writing, the army departs from their
quarters to advance on Ghent to demand the conditions lately
offered them, and the bearer of this letter will tell you what is the result.
M. the duke and his army marched up to Ghent and I have seen the bearing of the
citizens. They are very bitter and despondent. M. the marshall has been
parleying. I hear that matters have been settled. I hear that the Ghenters'
loss is thirteen to fourteen thousand men. I cannot write more for I have no
time owing to the haste of the messenger."
This
was written July 23d. There is another despatch of July 31st, giving the last
news, which was "very joyous." The public apology had just been enacted
"and
afterwards, in token of being conquered and as a confession that my said seigneur
was victorious, those of Ghent have delivered up all their banners to the
number of eighty. And on this day my said lord has created seven or eight
knights and heralds in honour of his triumph, which is inestimable."
The
duke's victory was certainly "inestimable" in its value to him, yet,
in spite of the rigour enforced on this defeated people, they were not as
crushed as they might have been had they submitted
in 1445. Philip was clever enough to be more lenient than appeared at first.
Ancient privileges were confirmed in a special compact, and the duke swore to
maintain all former concessions in their entirety except in the points above
specified. Liberty of person was guaranteed, and it was expressly stipulated
that if the bailiff refused to sustain the sheriffs in their exercise of
justice, or tried to arrogate to himself more than his due authority, he should
forfeit his office. Lastly, and more important than all, the duke made no
attempt to revive the demand for the gabellesalt was left free and untaxed. As a matter of fact, too, the duke was
not exigeant in the fulfilment of every item of the treaty and, two years
later, he increased certain privileges. He had cut the lion's claws but he had
no desire to pit his strength again with Flemish communes. He had taught the
audacious rebels a lesson and that sufficed him.
 |
|
|