XVII
TOTILA
With the fall of Ravenna, and the captivity
of King Witigis, it seemed as if the chapter of
Ostrogothic dominion in Italy was ended. In fact, however, the war was
prolonged for a further period of thirteen years, a time glorious for the
Goths, disgraceful for the Empire, full of lamentation and woe for the unhappy
country which was to be the prize of victory.
The departure of Belisarius, summoned to the
East by his master in order to conduct another Persian war, left the newly won
provinces on an in cline sloping downwards to anarchy. Of all the generals who
remained behind, brave and capable men as some of them were, there was none who
possessed the unquestioned ascendancy of Belisarius, either in genius or
character. Each thought himself as good as the others: there was no
subordination, no hearty co-operation towards a common end, but instead of
these necessary conditions of success there was an eager emulation in the race
towards wealth, and in this ignoble contest the unhappy "Roman", the
Italian landholder, for whose sake, nominally, the Gothic war was undertaken,
found himself pillaged and trampled upon as he had never been by the most
brutal of the barbarians.
Nor were the military officers the only
offenders. A swarm of civil servants flew westwards from Byzantium and lighted
on the unhappy country. Their duty was to extort money by any and all means for
their master, their pleasure to accumulate fortunes for themselves; but whether
the logothete plundered for the Emperor or for
himself, the Italian tax-payer equally had the life-blood sucked from his
veins. Even the soldiers by whom the marvelous victories of the last five years
had been won, found themselves at the mercy of this hateful bureaucracy;
arrears of pay left undischarged, fines inflicted,
everything done to force upon their embittered souls the reflection that they
had served a mean and ungrateful master.
Of all these oppressors of Italy none was
more justly abhorred than Alexander the Logothete.
This man, who was placed at the head of the financial administration, and who
seems by virtue of that position to have been practically supreme in all but
military operations, had been lifted from a very humble sphere to eminence,
from poverty to boundless wealth, but the one justification which he could
always offer for his self-advancement was this, that no one else had been so
successful as he in filling the coffers of his master. The soldiers were, by
his proceedings against them, reduced to a poor, miserable, and despised
remnant. The Roman inhabitants of Italy, especially the nobles, found that he
hunted up with wonderful keenness and assiduity, and enforced with relentless
sternness all the claims--and they were probably not a few--which the
easy-tempered Gothic kings had suffered to lapse. In their simplicity these
nobles may have imagined that they could plead that they were serving the
Emperor by withholding contributions from the barbarian. Not so, however.
Theodoric, now that his dynasty had been overthrown, became again a legitimate
ruler, and Justinian as his heir would exact to the uttermost his unclaimed
rights. The nature of the grasping logothete was
well-known in his own country, and the Byzantines, using the old Greek weapon
of satire against an unpopular ruler, called him "Alexander the
Scissors", declaring that there was no one so clever as he in clipping the
gold coins of the currency without impairing their roundness.
The result of all these oppressions and this
misgovernment was to raise up in a marvelous manner the Gothic standard from
the dust into which it had fallen. When Belisarius left Italy, only one city still
remained to the Goths, the strong city of Ticinum,
which is now known as Pavia, and which, from its magnificent position at the
angle of the Ticino and the Po, was often in the early Middle Ages the last
stronghold to be surrendered in Northwestern Italy. Here had the Goths chosen
one of their nobles, Ildibad, for their king, but the
new king had but one thousand soldiers under him, and his might well seem a
desperate cause. Before the end of 540, however, the departure of Belisarius,
the wrangling among his successors, the oppressions of Alexander the Logothete, the disaffection of the ruined soldiery had
completely changed the face of affairs. An army of considerable size,
consisting in great measure of deserters from the Imperial standard, obeyed the
orders of Ildibad; he won a great pitched battle near
Treviso over Vitalius, the best of the Imperial
generals, and the whole of Italy north of the Po again owned the sway of the
Gothic king.
Internal feuds delayed for a little time the
revival of the strength of the barbarians. There was strife between Ildibad and the family of the deposed Witigis,
and this strife led to Ildibad's assassination and to
the election of an utterly incapable successor, Eraric the Rugian. But in the autumn of 541 all these domestic
discords were at an end; Eraric had been slain, and
the nephew of Ildibad was the universally recognized
king of the Ostrogoths. This man, who was destined to reign for eleven years,
twice to stand as conqueror within the walls of Rome, to bring back almost the
whole of Italy under the dominion of his people, to be in a scarcely lower
degree than Theodoric himself the hero and champion of the Ostrogothic race,
was the young and gallant Totila.
With true statesmanlike instinct the new
king perceived that the cause of the past failure of the Goths lay in the
alienated affections of the people of Italy. The greater misgovernment of the
Emperor's servants, the coldly calculating rapacity of Alexander the Scissors,
and the arrogant injustice of the generals, terrible only to the weak, had
given him a chance of winning back the love of the Italian people and of
restoring that happy state of things which prevailed after the downfall of
Odovacar, when all classes, nobles and peasants, Goths and Romans, joined in
welcoming Theodoric as their king. Totila therefore
kept a strong hand upon his soldiers, sternly repressed all plundering and
outrage, and insisted on the peasants being paid for all the stores which the
army needed on its march. One day a Roman inhabitant of Calabria came before
him to complain of one of the king's life-guardsmen who had committed an
outrage upon his daughter. The guardsman, not denying the charge, was at once
put in ward. Then the most influential nobles assembled at the king's tent, and
besought him not to punish a brave and capable soldier for such an offence. Totila replied that he mourned as much as they could do
over the necessity of taking away the life of one of his countrymen, but that
the common good, the safety of the nation, required this sacrifice. At the
outset of the war they had all the wealth of Italy and countless brave hearts
at their disposal, but all these advantages had availed them nothing because
they had an unjust king, Theodahad, at their head.
Now the Divine favour on their righteous cause seemed
to be giving them the victory, but only by a continuance in righteous deeds
could they hope to secure it. With these words he won over even the interceding
Goths to his opinion. The guardsman was sentenced to death, and his goods were
confiscated for the benefit of the maiden whom he had wronged.
At the same time that Totila showed himself thus gentle and just towards the Roman inhabitants, he skillfully
conducted the war so as to wound the Empire in its tenderest part--finance. Justinian's aim, in Italy as in Africa, was to make the newly
annexed territory pay its own expenses and hand over a good balance to the
Imperial treasury. It was for this purpose that the logothetes had been let loose upon Italy--that the provincials had been maddened by the
extortions of the tax-gatherer, that the soldiers had been driven to mutiny and
defection. Now with his loyal and well disciplined troops, Totila moved over the country from the Alps to Calabria, quietly collecting the taxes
claimed by the Emperor and the rents due to the refugee landlords, and in this
way, without oppressing the people, weakened the Imperial government and put
himself in a position to pay liberally for the commissariat of his army. Thus
the difficulties of the Imperial treasury increased. Justinian became more and
more unwilling to loosen his purse-strings for the sake of a province which
showed an ever-dwindling return. The pay of the soldiers got more and more
hopelessly into arrear. They deserted in increasing numbers to the standard of
the brave and generous young king of the Goths. Hence, it came to pass, that in
the spring of 544, when Totila had been only for two
and a half years king, he had gained two pitched battles by land and one by
sea, had taken Naples and Beneventum, could march freely from one end of Italy
to the other, and in fact, with the exception of Ravenna, Rome, and a few other
strongholds, had won back from the Empire the whole of that Italy which had
been acquired with so much toil and so much bloodshed.
There was, of course, bitter disappointment
in the council-chamber of Justinian at this issue of an enterprise which had
seemed at first so successful. There was but one sentence on all men's
lips--"Only Belisarius can recover Italy", and it was uttered so
loudly and so universally, that the Emperor could not but hear it. But
Justinian, ever since the offer of the Western throne to Belisarius, seems to
have looked upon him with jealousy as a possible rival, and (what was even more
fatal to his interests at court), the Empress Theodora had come to regard him
with dislike and suspicion, partly because of a domestic quarrel in which she
had taken the part of his wife Antonina against him,
and partly because when Justinian was lying plague-stricken and apparently at
the point of death, Belisarius had discussed the question of the succession to
the throne in a manner which the Empress considered hostile to her interests.
For these reasons the great general had been for some years in disgrace. A
large part of his property was taken away from him, and some of it was handed
over to Antonina, with whom he had been ordered to
reconcile himself on the most humbling terms: his great military household,
containing many men of servile origin, whom he had trained to such deeds of valour that it was a common saying, "One household
alone has destroyed the kingdom of Theodoric", was broken up, and those
brave men who would willingly have died for their chief, were portioned out by
lot among the other generals and the eunuchs of the palace.
Still, in deference to the unanimous opinion
of his counselors, Justinian decided once more to avail himself of the services
of Belisarius for the reconquest of Italy. But his unquenched jealousy of his
great general's fame, and the almost bankrupt condition of the Imperial
exchequer converged to the same point, and caused Justinian, while entrusting
Belisarius with the command, to couple with it the monstrous stipulation that
he was not to ask for any money for the war. And this, though it was clear to
all men that the want of money and the consequent
desertion of the Imperial standard by whole companies of grumbling barbarians,
had been one main cause of the amazing success of Totila.
Thus crippled by his master, and having his own spirit broken by Imperial
ingratitude and domestic unhappiness, Belisarius, in the whole course of his
second command in Italy, which lasted for five years--(544-549) did nothing, or
I should rather say only one thing, worthy of his former reputation. This is
the judgment which his former friend and admirer, Procopius, passes on this
period of his life. "Thus then", (in 549) "Belisarius departed
to Byzantium without glory, having been for five years in Italy, but having
never been strong enough to make a regular march by land in all that time, but
having flitted about from one fortress on the coast to another, and so left the
enemy free to capture Rome and almost every other place which they
attacked".
Notwithstanding this harsh sentence, it was
in connection with the siege of Rome that the old Belisarius, the man of
infinite resource and courageous dexterity, once more revealed himself, and
while we gladly let all the other events of these five tedious years glide into
oblivion, it is worth while devoting a few pages to the Second and Third Gothic
sieges of Rome.
Totila had quite determined not to
repeat the mistake of Witigis, by dashing his army to
pieces against the walls of Rome, but, for all that, he could not feel his
recovery of Italy to be complete so long as the Eternal City defied his power.
He therefore slowly tightened his grasp on the City, capturing one town after
another in its neighbourhood and watching the roads
to prevent convoys of provisions from entering it. He was on good terms with
the peasants of the surrounding country, paid liberally for all the provisions
required by his army (far smaller than that of Witigis),
and kept his soldiers in good heart and in high health, while the unhappy
citizens were seeing the great enemy--Famine--slowly approach nearer and nearer
to their homes.
Within the City there was now no such
provident and resourceful general as Belisarius. Bessas,
the commandant, himself an Ostrogoth of Mœsia by
birth, was a brave man, but coarse, selfish, and unfeeling. Intent only on
filling his own coffers by selling the corn which he had stored up in his
warehouses at a famine-price to the citizens, he was not touched by the
increasing misery around him, and made no effectual attempt to break the net
which Totila had drawn round Rome. Belisarius
himself, "flitting from point to point of the coast", had come to
Portus eighteen miles from Rome, at the mouth of the Tiber. It was no want of
good-will on his part that prevented him from bringing his provision-ships up the
river to the help of the famished City, but about four miles above Portus Totila had placed a strong boom of timber, protected in
front by an iron chain and guarded by two towers, one at each end of the bridge
which was above the boom. Belisarius made his preparations for destroying the
boom: a floating tower as high as the bridge placed on two barges, a large
vessel filled with "Greek fire" at the top of the tower, soldiers
below to hew the boom in pieces and sever the chain, a long train of merchantmen
behind laden with provisions for the hungry Romans, and manned by archers who
poured a deadly volley of arrows on the defenders of the bridge. All went well
with his design up to a certain point. The chain was severed, the Goths fell
fast under the arrows from the ships, the vessel of "Greek fire" was
hurled upon one of the forts, which was soon wrapped in flames. With might and
main the Imperial soldiers began to hack at the boom, and it seemed as if in a
few minutes the corn-laden vessels would be sailing up the Tiber, bringing glad
relief to the starving citizens. But just at that moment a horseman galloped up
to Belisarius with the unwelcome tidings--"Isaac is taken prisoner".
Isaac the Armenian was Belisarius' second in command, whom he had left at Portus
in charge of his stores, his munitions of war, and most important of all, the
now reconciled Antonina. In spite of Belisarius'
strict injunction to act solely on the defensive, Isaac, watching from afar the
successful movements of his chief, had sallied forth to attack the Gothic
garrison at Ostia on the opposite bank of the river. His defeat and consequent
capture were events of little moment in themselves, but all-important as
arresting the victorious career of Belisarius. For to the anxious soul of the
general the capture of Isaac seemed to mean the capture of Portus, the cutting
off of his army from their base of operations, the captivity of his beloved Antonina. He gave the signal for retreat; the attempt to
provision Rome had failed; the Imperial army returned to Portus. When he found
what it was that had really happened, and by what a combination of folly and
ill luck he had been prevented from winning a splendid victory, his annoyance
was so great that combined with the unwholesome air of the Campagna it threw him into a fever which brought him near to death and prevented him for
some months from taking any part in the war.
Meanwhile dire famine bore sway in the
beleaguered city. Wheat was sold for £22 a quarter, and the greater part of the
citizens were thankful to live on coarse bread made of bran, which was doled
out to them by Bessas at a quarter of the price of
wheat. Before long even this bran became a luxury beyond their power to
purchase. Dogs and mice provided them with their only meals of flesh, but the
staple article of food was nettles. With blackened skin and drawn faces, mere
ghosts of their former selves, the once proud and prosperous citizens of Rome
wandered about the waste places where these nettles grew, and often one of them
would be found dead with hunger, his strength having suddenly failed him while
attempting to gather his wretched meal.
At length this misery was suddenly ended.
Some Isaurian soldiers who were guarding the Asinarian Gate in the south-east of the City made overtures
to the Gothic soldiers for the betrayal of their post. These Isaurians were probably part of the former garrison of
Naples whom Totila had treated with great generosity
after the surrender of that city. They remembered the kindness then shown them;
they were weary of the siege, and disgusted with the selfish avarice of their
generals, and they soon came to terms with the besiegers. Four of the bravest
Goths being hoisted over the walls at night by the friendly Isaurians,
ran round to the Asinarian Gate, battered its bolts
and bars to pieces, and let in their waiting comrades. Unopposed, the Gothic
army marched in -17th December, 546-, unresisting, the Imperial troops marched
out by the Flaminian Gate. The play was precisely the same that had been enacted
ten years before when Belisarius won the city from Leudaris,
but with the parts reversed. What Witigis with his
one hundred and fifty thousand Goths had failed to accomplish, an army of not
more than a tenth of that number had accomplished under Totila. Bessas and the other generals fled headlong with the
rest of the crowd that pressed out of the Flaminian Gate, and the treasure,
accumulated with such brutal disregard of human suffering, fell into the hands
of the besiegers.
At first murder and plunder raged unchecked
through the streets of the City, the exasperation which had been caused by the
events of the long siege having made every Gothic heart bitter against Rome and
Romans. But after sixty citizens had been slain, Totila,
who had gone to St. Peter's to offer up his prayers and thanksgivings, listened
to the intercession of the deacon Pelagius and commanded that slaughter should
cease. But there were only five hundred citizens left in Rome to receive the
benefit of the amnesty, so great had been the depopulation of the City by war
and famine.
And now had come a fateful moment in the
history of Roma Æterna. A conqueror stood within her
walls, not in mere joyousness of heart like Alaric, pleased with the exploit of
bringing to her knees the mistress of the world, not intent on vulgar plans of
plunder like Gaiseric, but nourishing a deep and deadly hatred against that
false and ungrateful City, and, by the ghosts of a hundred and fifty thousand
of his countrymen who had died before her untaken walls, beckoned on a
memorable revenge. Totila would spare, as he had
promised, the lives of the trembling citizens, but he had determined that Rome
herself should perish. The walls should be dismantled, the public buildings
burned to the ground, and sheep should graze again over the seven hills of the
City as they had grazed thirteen hundred years before, when Romulus and Remus
were suckled by the wolf. From this purpose, however, he was moved by the
intercession of Belisarius, who, from his couch of fever, wrote a
spirit-stirring letter to Totila, pleading for Rome,
greatest and most glorious of all cities that the sun looked down upon, the
work not of one king nor one century, but of long ages and many generations of
noble men. Belisarius concluded with an appeal to the Gothic king to consider
what should be his own eternal record in history, whether he would rather be
remembered as the preserver or the destroyer of the greatest city in the world.
This appeal, made by one hero to another,
was successful. Totila was still bent on preventing
the City from ever again becoming a stronghold of the enemy, and therefore
determined to lay one-third of the walls level with the ground, but he assured
the messengers of Belisarius that he would leave the great monuments of Rome
untouched. Having accomplished the needed demolition of her defences,
he marched forth with his army from the desolate and sepulchral City and took
up a position in the Alban Mountains, which are seen by the dwellers in Rome
far off on their south-eastern horizon.
When Totila withdrew Rome was left, we are told, absolutely devoid of inhabitants. The
Senators he kept in his camp as hostages, and all the less influential citizens
with their wives and children were sent away to the confines of Campania. For
forty days or more the great City which had been for so long the heart of the
human universe, the city which, with the million-fold tide of life throbbing in
her veins, had most vividly prefigured the London of our own day, remained
"waste and without inhabitants", as desolate as Anderida in Kent had been left half a century before by her savage Saxon conquerors.
And then came another change--one of the
most marvelous in the history of that
City whose whole life has been a marvel. While Totila abode in his camp on the Alban Hills, Belisarius, rising from the bed to which
fever had for so many weeks chained him, made a visit to Rome, accompanied by a
thousand soldiers, that he might see with his own eyes into what depth of
calamity she had fallen. At first, it would seem, mere curiosity led him to the
ruined City, but when he was there, gazing on Totila's work of devastation, a brilliant thought flashed through his brain. After all
the demolitions of Totila, the ruin was not
irretrievable. By repairing the rents in the walls, Rome might yet be made
defensible. He would re-occupy it, and the Goths should find that they had all
their work to do over again. The idea seemed at first to his counselors like
the suggestion of delirium, but as it rapidly took shape under his hands, it
was recognized as being indeed a masterstroke of well-calculated audacity.
Leaving a small body of men to guard his base of operations at Portus, he moved
every available man to Rome, crowded them up to the gaps made by Totila, bade them build anyhow, with any sort of
material--mortar was out of the question; it must be mere dry walling that they
could accomplish,--only let them preserve some semblance of an upright wall,
and crown the summit of it with a rampart of stakes. The deep fosse below
fortunately remained as it was, not filled up. So in five and twenty days the
circuit of the walls was completed, truly in a most slovenly style of building,
the marks of which we can see even to this day, but Rome was once again a
"fenced city". As soon as Totila heard the
unwelcome tidings, he marched with his whole army to Rome, hoping to take the
City, as his soldiers said, "at the first shout". But he had
Belisarius to deal with, not Bessas. There had not
yet been time even to make new gates for the City instead of those which Totila had destroyed, but Belisarius planted all his
bravest soldiers in the void places where the gates should be, and guarded the
approach by caltrops (somewhat like those wherewith Bruce defended his line at
Bannockburn), so as to make a charge of Gothic cavalry impossible. Three long
days of hard-fought battle were spent round the fateful City. In each the
Goths, whatever temporary advantages they might gain, were finally repulsed,
and at length Totila, who was not going to repeat the
error of Witigis, marched away from the too well-known scene, amid the bitter reproaches of the
Gothic nobles, who before had praised him like a god for all his valour and dexterity in war, but now, on the morrow of his
first great blunder, loudly upbraided him for his imprudence, adding the
obvious and easy piece of Epimethean criticism,
"that the City ought either to have been utterly destroyed, or else
occupied with a sufficient force". Meanwhile Belisarius at his leisure
completed the repair of the walls, hung the massive gates on their hinges, had
keys made to fit their locks, and sent the duplicate keys to Justinian. The
Roman Empire once again had Rome.
And yet this re-occupation of the Eternal
City, brilliant and striking achievement as it was, had little influence on the
course of the war. Rome was now like a great stone left in an alluvial plain
showing where the river had once flowed, but the currents of commerce, of
politics, of war, flowed now in other channels. Belisarius, leaving a garrison
in Rome, had to betake himself once more to that desultory warfare, flitting
round the coast from one naval fortress to another, in which the earlier years
of his second command had been passed; and at length, early in 549, only two years
after his re-occupation of Rome, he obtained as a great favour,
through the intercession of Antonina, permission to
resign his command and return to Constantinople. It was on this occasion that
Procopius passed that harsh judgment as to the inglorious character of these
later operations of his in Italy, which was quoted on a previous page.
I will briefly summarize the subsequent
events in the life of the old hero:
Once more, ten years after the return of
Belisarius (in 559), his services were claimed by Justinian in order to repel a
horde of savage Huns who had penetrated within eighteen miles of
Constantinople. The work was brilliantly done, with much of the old ingenuity
and fertility of resource which had marked his first campaign in Italy, and then
Belisarius relapsed into inactivity. He was again accused (562), probably
without justice, of abetting a conspiracy against the Emperor, was disgraced
and imprisoned in his own palace. After seven months he was restored to the
Imperial favour, the falsity of the accusation
against him having probably become apparent. He died in 565, in about the
sixtieth year of his age, and only a few months before his jealous master. He
had more than once had to endure the withdrawal of that master's confidence,
and some portions of his vast wealth were on two occasions taken from him. But
this is all that can be truly said as to the reverses of fortune undergone by
the conqueror of the Vandals and the Goths. The stories of his blindness and of
his beggary, of his holding forth a wooden bowl and whining out "Date obolum Belisario", rest on
no good foundation, and either arise from a confusion between Belisarius and
another disgraced minister of Justinian, or else are simply due to the
myth-making industry of the Middle Ages.
|