| |
HISTORY OF ROME-THE IMPERIAL PEACE
IV
FLAVIAN WARS AND FRONTIERS
V.
THE ADVANCE IN GERMANY
The
disturbances which the crisis of the year 69 had called forth did not long
survive the triumph of the Flavian cause. The ignominious collapse of the Imperium Galliarum,
was followed, not without serious fighting, by the termination of the Batavian
War in the late autumn of AD 70. What the system of defense on the Lower Rhine
now required was repair and re-organization: and so the composition, but not
the size or function of the army was modified. The repentant Batavians returned
to their old allegiance on the old terms. The Frisii,
as before, were accessible to Roman influence. It was not intended, here or
elsewhere, that the power of Rome should stop short at the frontier which she
had chosen and fortified: and it might further be conjectured that the Tencteri and the Usipi, whose
lands extended along the right bank of the Rhine from the Ruhr to the Lahn, showed themselves amenable.
Drastic
measures were taken against the Bructeri, a confederation, who dwelt to the
north of the Tencteri between the Lippe and the Ems. They had embraced the enterprises of Civilis with alacrity and with effect—the veneration in which their priestess Veleda was widely held was a powerful force on the side of
the insurgents. Whether the Romans had dispatched punitive expeditions beyond
the Rhine immediately after the end of the Batavian War is not known, but at
some time in the years 75—78 Rutilius Gallicus defeated the Bructeri and secured the person of Veleda. This did not reduce them to acquiescence. At a
later date (which cannot more closely be determined) another governor of Lower
Germany, Vestricius Spurinna,
entered the territory of the Bructeri, and by the mere threat of war compelled
them to take back a king whom they had driven out. It may be to another aspect
of the same incident that Tacitus is referring when he describes how in the
presence of a Roman army and without the shedding of Roman blood, sixty
thousand of the Bructeri were massacred by a coalition of the neighboring
peoples. It is evident that imperial policy had been pursuing its traditional
methods with skill and with economy.
The
line of the Rhine was guarded as before, but more firmly. Hitherto the forts
occupied by the auxilia had been built of earth, strengthened with timber. A line of stone forts was
now constructed, garrisoned by a new series of regiments, drawn from other provinces.
Four new legions were brought to Lower Germany: and their camps too were built
in stone. A new position, Noviomagus (Nymwegen), watching the island of the Batavians, was chosen
for a legion and garrisoned by X Gemina: and the old
double camp of Vetera was replaced by a stone
fortress for one legion, XXII Primigenia. The other
two legions, VI Victrix and XXI Rapax,
occupied Novaesium and Bonna.
The
army of Upper Germany likewise numbered four legions. I Adiutrix and XIV Gemina built for themselves a new stone
fortress at Moguntiacum. Argentorate was occupied by VIII Augusta, Vindonissa by XI
Claudia. But the forts of the auxiliary regiments southwards from Mainz at
least were not rebuilt in stone. These positions were soon abandoned and the
garrisons were transferred to the right bank of the Rhine.
The
history of the advance of the Roman frontier in Germany beyond the Rhine and the
Danube cannot be recovered, even in outline, from the fragments that have
survived of literary records. The details of the Roman military occupation
beyond the Rhine have been won and co-ordinated by
the thorough and continuous archaeological investigation of the last fifty
years. The evidence consists of inscriptions, stamped tiles of legions and
auxiliary regiments, coins and pottery and, not least, the forts themselves,
by reason of their situation and structure. This evidence varies enormously in
extent and character from region to region: sometimes abundant and convergent,
as in the Wetterau, sometimes scanty, as on the line
of the Neckar and in the Raetian. History will not
always be the loser if it prefers a generously wide margin to a date that is
delusively definite.
So
much for the methods of study. It remains to summarize the results. Across the
Rhine from Moguntiacum the Mattiaci between the Taunus and the mouth of the Main appear to have remained in
amicable dependence ever since the days of Augustus down to AD 69, when they
yielded to the temptation of attacking Moguntiacum in
alliance with the Chatti and the Usipi. After this
brief interlude they returned to their allegiance. New forts of earth were
established in this territory at Wiesbaden (Aquae Mattiacae) and at Hofheim, a few
miles farther east. Southwards from Moguntiacum after
a brief occupation such as is attested at Rheingonheim in the Palatinate opposite the old Neckar, the auxiliary regiments south of
Mainz were transferred early in the reign of Vespasian from the left to the
right bank of the Rhine. For Rheingonheim, which had
probably housed a garrison of two regiments, were substituted forts at Ladenburg
(Lopodunum) and at Neuenheim,
on the Lower Neckar near Heidelberg. To the north, between the Neckar and the
Main, forts may have been established at Gross Gerau and Gernsheim, but there is no sufficient evidence:
south of the Neckar, however, Baden-Baden was occupied, but the sites of most of
the other new forts, like their predecessors on the left bank of the Rhine, are
still a matter for conjecture.
In
the extreme south-west of Germany, however, in the angle between the Upper
Rhine and the sources of the Danube, the Roman advance is attested by more
definite evidence and presents more decisive features. Across the Schwarzwald a road was constructed, running
south-eastwards up the valley of the Kinzig to Rottweil (Arae Flaviae), and thence continued to the bank of the Danube
near Tuttlingen or Laiz. In
this way Rottweil was reached from the direction of
the legionary camp of Argentorate. The advance had
probably been a converging one, for another road came to Rottweil from the south, from Vindonissa by way of Schleitheim and Hufingen. On the
line of the road across the Schwarzwald forts were
built at Offenburg, Waldmossingen and Rottweil: and it was further protected by posts at Sulz to the north and at Geislingen to the east.
The
military operations of which this modest advance was the permanent but perhaps
not the only result may be dated to the years 73-4. The governor of Upper
Germany, Cn. Pinarius Cornelius Clemens, received the ornamenta triumphalia and two senators who held in succession the
command over the auxiliary forces were also decorated. Moreover, a fifth legion
appears at this time to have been attached to the army of Upper Germany. None
the less, despite this imposing array, despite the decorations for service in
the field, the campaign may have been more a display than an exertion of force.
Numbers of troops would be needed, not merely to overawe opposition, but to
provide the labor for roads and forts. In all the wide expanse of territory
bounded by the Rhine and the Danube and extending north-eastwards to the lands
of the Chatti and the Hermunduri there does not appear to have been a single
large and formidable fighting tribe: the population—by no means as scanty as
ancient accounts have been taken to imply—was mixed in origin, the relic of
wars and migrations, and predominantly Celtic in civilization.
This
region does not enter into the history of the Augustan wars of conquest, and
subsequently a strong and organized system of defense would have been
superfluous. A reason for the advance will perhaps be discovered in the need
for a shorter route of communication between the armies of the Rhine and the
Danube—and thence, ultimately, an economy in troops. How far Vespasian intended
the advance in southern Germany to proceed is unknown—before the end of his
reign, several of the Raetian forts may have been
transferred to the northern bank of the Danube. Be that as it may, the
intervention of Domitian was vigorous and eventful.
|
|