![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
THIRD MILLENNIUM LIBRARY |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Religion of Ancient Egypt
Archibald Henry Sayce
Lecture
3 | The Imperishable Part of Man and the Other World
Lecture
4 | The Sun-God and the Ennead
Lecture
7 | Osiris and the Osirian Faith
Lecture
9 | The Popular Religion of Egypt
Lecture 10 | The Place of Egyptian Religion in the History of Theology
Preface
THE subject of the following Lectures was “The Conception of the Divine
among the ancient Egyptians and Babylonians,” and in writing them I have kept
this aspect of them constantly in view. The time has not yet come for a
systematic history of Babylonian religion, whatever may be the case as regards
ancient Egypt, and, for reasons stated in the test, we must be content with
general principles and fragmentary details.
It is on this account that so little advance has been made in grasping
the real nature and characteristics of Babylonian religion, and that a sort of
natural history description of it has been supposed to be all that is needed by
the student of religion. While reading over again my Hibbert Lectures, as well as later works on the subject, I have been gratified at
finding how largely they have borrowed from me, even though it be without
acknowledgment. But my Hibbert Lectures were necessarily
a pioneering work, and we must now attempt to build on the materials which were
there brought together. In the present volume, therefore, the materials are
presupposed; they will be found for the most part either in my Hibbert Lectures or in the cuneiform texts which have since
been published.
We are better off, fortunately, as regards the religion of ancient
Egypt. Thanks more especially to Professor Maspero's unrivalled combination of learning and genius, we are beginning to learn what
the old Egyptian faith actually was, and what were the foundations on which it
rested. The development of its dogmas can be traced, at all events to a certain
extent, and we can even watch the progress of their decay.
There are two facts which, I am bound to add, have been forced upon me
by a study of the old religions of civilized humanity. On the one hand, they
testify to the continuity of religious thought. God's light lighteth every man that cometh into the world, and the religions of Egypt and Babylonia
illustrate the words of the evangelist. They form, as it were, the background
and preparation for Judaism and Christianity; Christianity is the fulfillment,
not of the Law only, but of all that was truest and best in the religions of
the ancient world. In it the beliefs and aspirations of Egypt and Babylonia
have found their explanation and fulfillment. But, on the other hand, between
Judaism and the coarsely polytheistic religion of Babylonia, as also between
Christianity and the old Egyptian faith,—in spite of its high morality and
spiritual insight,—there lies an impassable gulf. And for the existence of this
gulf I can find only one explanation, unfashionable and antiquated though it
be. In the language of a former generation, it marks the dividing-line between revelation
and unrevealed religion. It is like that “something,” hard to define, yet
impossible to deny, which separates man from the ape, even though on the
physiological side the ape may be the ancestor of the man.
A. H. SAYCE.
|
|||